From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>,
akataria@vmware.com, Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@vmware.com>,
Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@sf-tec.de>,
Maxime Austruy <maustruy@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI driver for VMware's virtual HBA.
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 18:34:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2e108260909010934k7be05930lfa544ea914224cf1@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adaws4iod8k.fsf@cisco.com>
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com> wrote:
> > - Reuse the ib_ipoib kernel module to provide an IP stack on top of
> > the new RDMA driver instead of having to maintain a separate network
> > driver for this hardware (ibmveth).
>
> I don't think this really makes sense, because IPoIB is not really
> handling ethernet (it is a different L2 ethernet encapsulation), and I
> think the commonality with ibmveth is going to be minimal.
What I had in mind was not to start searching for code shared between
the ipoib and ibmveth kernel modules, but to replace the virtual
Ethernet layer by IPoIB on top of a new RDMA driver. I'm not sure
however this approach would work better than the currently implemented
approach in ibmveth.
> I'm not really sure we should be trying to force drivers to share just
> because they are paravirtualized -- if there is real commonality, then
> sure put it in common code, but different hypervisors are probably as
> different as different hardware.
Agreed. But several people are currently looking at how to improve the
performance of I/O performed inside a virtual machine without being
familiar with the VIA architecture or the RDMA API. This is a pity
because the Virtual Interface Architecture was designed to allow
high-throughput low-latency I/O, and has some features that are not
present in any other mainstream I/O architecture I know of (e.g. the
ability to perform I/O from userspace without having to invoke any
system call in the performance-critical path).
Bart.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-01 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-27 23:17 [PATCH] SCSI driver for VMware's virtual HBA Alok Kataria
2009-08-28 6:03 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2009-08-31 17:26 ` Alok Kataria
2009-08-31 18:51 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2009-08-31 21:54 ` Alok Kataria
2009-08-31 17:28 ` Alok Kataria
2009-08-31 18:00 ` James Bottomley
2009-08-31 21:53 ` Alok Kataria
2009-09-01 14:23 ` James Bottomley
2009-09-01 16:08 ` Alok Kataria
2009-09-01 16:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-09-01 16:20 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-09-01 16:47 ` Alok Kataria
2009-09-01 14:26 ` James Bottomley
2009-09-01 11:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2009-09-01 14:17 ` James Bottomley
2009-09-01 16:12 ` Roland Dreier
2009-09-01 16:16 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-09-01 16:33 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-09-01 16:52 ` James Bottomley
2009-09-01 16:59 ` Alok Kataria
2009-09-01 17:25 ` James Bottomley
2009-09-01 17:41 ` Alok Kataria
2009-09-01 18:15 ` James Bottomley
2009-09-02 2:55 ` Alok Kataria
2009-09-02 15:06 ` James Bottomley
2009-09-02 17:16 ` Alok Kataria
2009-09-03 20:03 ` James Bottomley
2009-09-03 20:31 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-09-03 21:21 ` Ric Wheeler
2009-09-03 21:41 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-09-04 3:28 ` Alok Kataria
2009-09-01 17:25 ` Roland Dreier
2009-09-01 17:40 ` James Bottomley
2009-09-01 17:54 ` Alok Kataria
2009-09-01 18:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-02 9:50 ` Bart Van Assche
2009-09-01 16:34 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e2e108260909010934k7be05930lfa544ea914224cf1@mail.gmail.com \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=akataria@vmware.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dtor@vmware.com \
--cc=eike-kernel@sf-tec.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maustruy@vmware.com \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=robert.w.love@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox