From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: oleksandr@natalenko.name Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] block/scsi: safe SCSI quiescing Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2017 08:24:46 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20170831172728.15817-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <1576539.niWZoWEnd8@natalenko.name> <20170831173833.GC5928@ming.t460p> <14328863.IIXMb7O2AM@natalenko.name> <20170901034532.GD16525@ming.t460p> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from vulcan.natalenko.name ([104.207.131.136]:31080 "EHLO vulcan.natalenko.name" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751422AbdIAGYu (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Sep 2017 02:24:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170901034532.GD16525@ming.t460p> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Ming Lei Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Bart Van Assche , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "Martin K . Petersen" , "James E . J . Bottomley" Hi. 01.09.2017 05:45, Ming Lei wrote: > Could you try the following patch against this patchset to see > if there is still the warning? With this patch I wasn't able to trigger per-CPU-related warning. Also, for 8th patch you've written: > I have sent one delta patch in list, which will only call > blk_queue_enter_live() iff SCSI device is in QUIESCE. This refers to the patch I've just tested, right?