From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Juergen Gross Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xen-scsiback: One function call less in scsiback_device_action() after error detection Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 07:11:36 +0200 Message-ID: References: <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net> <530A086E.8010901@users.sourceforge.net> <530A72AA.3000601@users.sourceforge.net> <530B5FB6.6010207@users.sourceforge.net> <530C5E18.1020800@users.sourceforge.net> <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <59e51c7d-f7bb-c55f-d2fe-06dccfef6a99@users.sourceforge.net> <87e55a72-71ad-d0a1-b936-12565bbc6508@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87e55a72-71ad-d0a1-b936-12565bbc6508@users.sourceforge.net> Sender: kernel-janitors-owner@vger.kernel.org To: SF Markus Elfring , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, David Vrabel , Boris Ostrovsky Cc: LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 16/07/16 22:23, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring > Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 21:42:42 +0200 > > The kfree() function was called in one case by the > scsiback_device_action() function during error handling > even if the passed variable "tmr" contained a null pointer. > > Adjust jump targets according to the Linux coding style convention. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring > --- > drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c | 7 ++++--- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c b/drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c > index 4a48c06..7612bc9 100644 > --- a/drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c > +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c > @@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static void scsiback_device_action(struct vscsibk_pend *pending_req, > tmr = kzalloc(sizeof(struct scsiback_tmr), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!tmr) { > target_put_sess_cmd(se_cmd); > - goto err; > + goto do_resp; > } Hmm, I'm not convinced this is an improvement. I'd rather rename the new error label to "put_cmd" and get rid of the braces in above if statement: - if (!tmr) { - target_put_sess_cmd(se_cmd); - goto err; - } + if (!tmr) + goto put_cmd; and then in the error path: -err: +put_cmd: + target_put_sess_cmd(se_cmd); +free_tmr: kfree(tmr); Juergen > > init_waitqueue_head(&tmr->tmr_wait); > @@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ static void scsiback_device_action(struct vscsibk_pend *pending_req, > unpacked_lun, tmr, act, GFP_KERNEL, > tag, TARGET_SCF_ACK_KREF); > if (rc) > - goto err; > + goto free_tmr; > > wait_event(tmr->tmr_wait, atomic_read(&tmr->tmr_complete)); > > @@ -626,8 +626,9 @@ static void scsiback_device_action(struct vscsibk_pend *pending_req, > scsiback_do_resp_with_sense(NULL, err, 0, pending_req); > transport_generic_free_cmd(&pending_req->se_cmd, 1); > return; > -err: > +free_tmr: > kfree(tmr); > +do_resp: > scsiback_do_resp_with_sense(NULL, err, 0, pending_req); > } > >