Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Can Guo <can.guo@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	avri.altman@wdc.com, beanhuo@micron.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, mani@kernel.org
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	Sai Krishna Potthuri <sai.krishna.potthuri@amd.com>,
	Ajay Neeli <ajay.neeli@amd.com>,
	Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
	Peter Wang <peter.wang@mediatek.com>,
	Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>,
	Stanley Jhu <chu.stanley@gmail.com>,
	Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@gmail.com>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	"Bao D. Nguyen" <quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Archana Patni <archana.patni@intel.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:UNIVERSAL FLASH STORAGE HOST CONTROLLER DRIVER..."
	<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG S3C,
	S5P AND EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"moderated list:UNIVERSAL FLASH STORAGE HOST CONTROLLER
	DRIVER..." <linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list:ARM/QUALCOMM MAILING LIST"
	<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] scsi: ufs: core: Introduce a new ufshcd vops negotiate_pwr_mode()
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 15:09:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fff6bc07-169b-48aa-a6c2-0d243bad0d82@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260308151409.3779137-2-can.guo@oss.qualcomm.com>

On 3/8/26 8:13 AM, Can Guo wrote:
> +static int exynos_ufs_negotiate_pwr_mode(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> +					 const struct ufs_pa_layer_attr *dev_max_params,
> +					 struct ufs_pa_layer_attr *dev_req_params)
> +{
> +	struct ufs_host_params host_params;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!dev_req_params) {
> +		pr_err("%s: incoming dev_req_params is NULL\n", __func__);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	ufshcd_init_host_params(&host_params);
> +
> +	/* This driver only support symmetric gear setting e.g. hs_tx_gear == hs_rx_gear */
> +	host_params.hs_tx_gear = exynos_ufs_get_hs_gear(hba);
> +	host_params.hs_rx_gear = exynos_ufs_get_hs_gear(hba);
> +
> +	ret = ufshcd_negotiate_pwr_params(&host_params, dev_max_params, dev_req_params);
> +	if (ret)
> +		pr_err("%s: failed to determine capabilities\n", __func__);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}

The dev_req_params test is not necessary since the UFS core never passes 
a NULL pointer as third argument, isn't it? I propose to remove the
dev_req_params test.

> +static int ufs_hisi_negotiate_pwr_mode(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> +				       const struct ufs_pa_layer_attr *dev_max_params,
> +				       struct ufs_pa_layer_attr *dev_req_params)
> +{
> +	struct ufs_host_params host_params;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!dev_req_params) {
> +		dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: incoming dev_req_params is NULL\n", __func__);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	ufs_hisi_set_dev_cap(&host_params);
> +	ret = ufshcd_negotiate_pwr_params(&host_params, dev_max_params, dev_req_params);
> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: failed to determine capabilities\n", __func__);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}

Same comment here - please remove the dev_req_params test.

> +static int ufs_qcom_negotiate_pwr_mode(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> +				       const struct ufs_pa_layer_attr *dev_max_params,
> +				       struct ufs_pa_layer_attr *dev_req_params)
>   {
>   	struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba);
>   	struct ufs_host_params *host_params = &host->host_params;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!dev_req_params) {
> +		pr_err("%s: incoming dev_req_params is NULL\n", __func__);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = ufshcd_negotiate_pwr_params(host_params, dev_max_params, dev_req_params);
> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: failed to determine capabilities\n", __func__);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}

Also here, please remove the dev_req_params test.

Additionally, I see that identical "if (ret) dev_err(...)" code occurs
in the three callbacks shown above. Shouldn't that code be moved into
the only caller of these functions in the UFS core?

Thanks,

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-13 22:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-08 15:13 [PATCH v3 00/12] scsi: ufs: Add TX Equalization support for UFS 5.0 Can Guo
2026-03-08 15:13 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] scsi: ufs: core: Introduce a new ufshcd vops negotiate_pwr_mode() Can Guo
2026-03-13 22:09   ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2026-03-14  7:21     ` Can Guo
2026-03-08 15:13 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] scsi: ufs: core: Pass force_pmc to ufshcd_config_pwr_mode() as a parameter Can Guo
2026-03-08 15:14 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] scsi: ufs: core: Add UFS_HS_G6 and UFS_HS_GEAR_MAX to enum ufs_hs_gear_tag Can Guo
2026-03-08 15:14 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] scsi: ufs: core: Add support for TX Equalization Can Guo
2026-03-13 22:19   ` Bart Van Assche
2026-03-14  8:19     ` Can Guo
2026-03-14  9:33       ` Can Guo
2026-03-16 16:55         ` Bart Van Assche
2026-03-17  7:04           ` Can Guo
2026-03-17  6:49   ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2026-03-17  7:22     ` Can Guo
2026-03-17  7:35       ` Can Guo
2026-03-17 13:10         ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2026-03-19  5:49           ` Can Guo
2026-03-19 12:42             ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2026-03-21  2:30               ` Can Guo
2026-03-17 13:08       ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2026-03-19  5:42         ` Can Guo
2026-03-08 15:14 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] scsi: ufs: core: Add debugfs entries for TX Equalization params Can Guo
2026-03-13 22:21   ` Bart Van Assche
2026-03-08 15:14 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] scsi: ufs: core: Add helpers to pause and resume command processing Can Guo
2026-03-13 22:26   ` Bart Van Assche
2026-03-14 10:38     ` Can Guo
2026-03-16 17:12       ` Bart Van Assche
2026-03-16 18:07       ` Bart Van Assche
2026-03-08 15:14 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] scsi: ufs: core: Add support to refresh TX Equalization via debugfs Can Guo
2026-03-13 22:30   ` Bart Van Assche
2026-03-14 10:45     ` Can Guo
2026-03-16 17:14       ` Bart Van Assche
2026-03-17 13:05         ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2026-03-19  5:36           ` Can Guo
2026-03-08 15:14 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Fixup PAM-4 TX L0_L1_L2_L3 adaptation pattern length Can Guo
2026-03-08 15:14 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Implement vops tx_eqtr_notify() Can Guo
2026-03-08 15:14 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Implement vops get_rx_fom() Can Guo
2026-03-08 15:14 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Implement vops apply_tx_eqtr_settings() Can Guo
2026-03-08 15:14 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Enable TX Equalization Can Guo
2026-03-13 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] scsi: ufs: Add TX Equalization support for UFS 5.0 Bart Van Assche
2026-03-14 10:48   ` Can Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fff6bc07-169b-48aa-a6c2-0d243bad0d82@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ajay.neeli@amd.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=archana.patni@intel.com \
    --cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
    --cc=can.guo@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=chaotian.jing@mediatek.com \
    --cc=chu.stanley@gmail.com \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
    --cc=peter.griffin@linaro.org \
    --cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com \
    --cc=sai.krishna.potthuri@amd.com \
    --cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox