From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bart Van Assche Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] dm mpath: vastly improve blk-mq IO performance Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 15:48:12 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1459454666-76428-1-git-send-email-snitzer@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:42935 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751410AbcEIQaN (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2016 12:30:13 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1azo4L-00051T-5p for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 09 May 2016 18:30:06 +0200 Received: from 63.163.107.100 ([63.163.107.100]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 May 2016 18:30:05 +0200 Received: from bart.vanassche by 63.163.107.100 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 May 2016 18:30:05 +0200 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Mike Snitzer redhat.com> writes: > I developed these changes some weeks ago but have since focused on > regression and performance testing on larger NUMA systems. Hello Mike, Sorry that I do yet have any performance numbers available for the SRP protocol for this patch series. But I want to let you know that since I started testing this patch series three weeks ago that I haven't seen any regressions caused by this patch series. Bart.