From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: vgoyal@in.ibm.com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Neela.Kolli@engenio.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
mike.miller@hp.com, fastboot@lists.osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 2/2] kdump: cciss driver initialization issue fix
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 08:17:27 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m11wtcvw5k.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060626133504.GA8985@in.ibm.com> (Vivek Goyal's message of "Mon, 26 Jun 2006 09:35:04 -0400")
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 07:41:00AM +0530, Maneesh Soni wrote:
>
> Maneesh, Keeping this code under a config option becomes a problem when we
> will have a relocatable kernel. At some point of time we got to have
> relocatable kernel so that people don't have to build two kernels. In fact
> this is becoming a pain area for distros. That's the reason I thought
> of making it a command line parameter.
Ok. Even if we do this with a command line, we need to have a clean concept.
If the concept is ignore devices with a brittle init routine that is comprehensible
and potentially useful for other reasons than crash dumps.
If the concept is crashdump it is a poorly defined concept and all of Andrews
objections apply.
> I remember few months back, Eric had mentioned that he has got patches for
> relocatable kernel ready for review for i386 and x86_64. Eric, do you have
> any plans to post the patches for review?
I have some code that I keep intending to get to. It has probably bit rotted
since I wrote it, but it shouldn't be too bad to clean up.
Unfortunately the whole crashdump thing is fairly low on my priority list.
Although I suspect a relocatable kernel is actually easier than the more
important task of moving IRQ initialization into init_IRQ. on x86 and x86_64.
At least I have managed to remove 3 layers of indirection in the x86_64 irq
handling code recently :)
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-26 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-23 21:01 [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] introduce crashboot kernel command line parameter Vivek Goyal
2006-06-23 21:04 ` [RFC] [PATCH 2/2] kdump: cciss driver initialization issue fix Vivek Goyal
2006-06-24 6:55 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-24 11:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-06-24 11:30 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-24 12:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-06-24 17:13 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-26 2:11 ` [Fastboot] " Maneesh Soni
2006-06-26 13:35 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-06-26 14:17 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2006-06-26 15:32 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-06-26 16:00 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-26 16:13 ` Miller, Mike (OS Dev)
2006-06-26 16:35 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-06-26 16:38 ` [Fastboot] " Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-26 16:51 ` Miller, Mike (OS Dev)
2006-06-26 17:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-06-26 17:24 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-26 17:22 ` [Fastboot] " Vivek Goyal
2006-06-26 17:52 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-26 18:18 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-06-26 18:51 ` [Fastboot] " Miller, Mike (OS Dev)
2006-06-26 19:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-26 19:43 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-06-26 21:24 ` [Fastboot] " Miller, Mike (OS Dev)
2006-06-26 19:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-06-26 17:16 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-06-26 17:31 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-26 17:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-26 17:56 ` James Bottomley
2006-06-26 18:23 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-27 2:42 ` [RFC] [PATCH 2/2] kdump: cciss driver initialization?issue fix Horms
2006-06-26 9:09 ` Horms
2006-06-26 13:45 ` [Fastboot] " Vivek Goyal
2006-06-27 2:30 ` Horms
[not found] ` <E1FttEj-0002JH-00@calista.eckenfels.net>
2006-06-23 22:39 ` [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] introduce crashboot kernel command line parameter Vivek Goyal
2006-06-24 6:55 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m11wtcvw5k.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=Neela.Kolli@engenio.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=fastboot@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.miller@hp.com \
--cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox