From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Halasa Subject: Re: Proposal for new generic device API: dma_get_required_mask() Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 21:32:16 +0200 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: References: <1087481331.2210.27.camel@mulgrave> <20040618102120.A29213@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20040619212246.B8063@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20040620204723.B641@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from hq.pm.waw.pl ([195.116.170.10]:54224 "EHLO hq.pm.waw.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266665AbUFWU57 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:57:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20040620204723.B641@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (Russell King's message of "Sun, 20 Jun 2004 20:47:23 +0100") List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Linux Kernel Cc: James Bottomley , SCSI Mailing List Russell King writes: > So it's quite correct for this to be a device thing not a platform > thing. It _is_ the SA1111 device itself which has the problem. Now I see that. Many thanks for detailed explanation. -- Krzysztof Halasa, B*FH