public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>
To: Steffen Winterfeldt <snwint@suse.de>,
	SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
	matthew@wil.cx
Subject: Re: SuSE hwinfo/yast2 still confusing SYM53C8XX, killing tape backups
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:02:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3actaw0pv.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0411221102280.22230@ligeti.suse.de> (Steffen Winterfeldt's message of "Mon, 22 Nov 2004 11:35:26 +0100 (CET)")

Steffen Winterfeldt <snwint@suse.de> writes:

[Context: SuSE's hwscan --pci and lspci -xxx trigger SCSI parity errors
on reading /sys/devices/pci*/*/config of sym53c8xx devices, possibly
including phase fixup, a non-working abort loop of up to 2 minutes that
ends in a SCSI bus reset that fixes it, details below]
> hwinfo is just a normal program and doesn't do any special tricks on
> hardware. In particular, it issues an scsi inquiry command to get the serial
> number, but that's about all.
>
> If running just hwinfo breaks things for you, you might try running it
> through strace and look at the files it accesses. Maybe that gives some hint
> to narrow things down.

[dropping Andrew and Linus from the Cc:, adding Matthew Wilcox instead I
 think if it's a kernel issue, this can be propagated by the SCSI or
 SYM53C8XX maintainers]

I found a minimal way to reproduce the problem:

(adjust bus and device no. as appropriate, try: /sbin/lspci | grep 53c8):

cd /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:0d.0
dd if=config bs=1 count=1 of=/dev/null skip=216

hwscan or lspci -xxx reads all of the config file (256 bytes) which
includes this byte, lspci without -xxx reads selectively the first 68
bytes in several stages and avoids this (except lspci -xxx which also
triggers the parity error as it reads the whole 256 bytes).

So it looks as though the byte at offset 216 in
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:0d.0/config was "poisonous" for reading
somehow. I haven't dared to write there.

I wonder if hwscan should (and needs to) read the whole config space or
can go along with less, as lspci does.

Questions:

1. is it necessary that hwscan reads the whole configuration space?

2. is it a kernel bug if reading offset #216 (byte-wise) in the config
   file in sysfs confuses the hardware?

3. both?

-- 
Matthias Andree

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-11-22 12:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-14 21:20 [BK PATCH] SCSI -rc1 fixes James Bottomley
2004-11-14 23:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-11-14 23:09   ` James Bottomley
2004-11-14 23:54     ` Matthias Andree
2004-11-15  0:04       ` James Bottomley
2004-11-15  1:09         ` SuSE hwinfo/yast2 still confusing SYM53C8XX, killing tape backups (was: [BK PATCH] SCSI -rc1 fixes) Matthias Andree
2004-11-22 10:35           ` Steffen Winterfeldt
2004-11-22 11:17             ` Jens Axboe
2004-11-22 11:21               ` Steffen Winterfeldt
2004-11-22 11:23                 ` Jens Axboe
2004-11-22 11:33                   ` Steffen Winterfeldt
2004-11-22 11:37                     ` Jens Axboe
2004-11-22 12:02             ` Matthias Andree [this message]
2004-11-22 13:05               ` SuSE hwinfo/yast2 still confusing SYM53C8XX, killing tape backups Steffen Winterfeldt
2004-11-22 13:30               ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-11-22 14:05                 ` Matthias Andree
2004-11-26 14:16                   ` Steffen Winterfeldt
2004-11-27  0:40                     ` Matthias Andree
2004-11-29 11:16                       ` Steffen Winterfeldt
2004-11-29 11:24                         ` Matthias Andree
2004-12-03 22:35                 ` Matthias Andree
2004-11-22 12:06             ` Douglas Gilbert
2004-11-22 13:07               ` Steffen Winterfeldt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3actaw0pv.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org \
    --to=ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=snwint@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox