From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Halasa Subject: Re: Proposal for new generic device API: dma_get_required_mask() Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 01:10:31 +0200 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: References: <1087481331.2210.27.camel@mulgrave> <20040618102120.A29213@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from hq.pm.waw.pl ([195.116.170.10]:15337 "EHLO hq.pm.waw.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265755AbUFSNvS (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jun 2004 09:51:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20040618102120.A29213@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (Russell King's message of "Fri, 18 Jun 2004 10:21:20 +0100") List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Linux Kernel , SCSI Mailing List Russell King writes: > Good idea, except for the fact that we have drivers merged which have > real masks like 0x0fefffff. It _really is_ a mask and not a number > of bits. Which drivers do you mean? And which platforms support it? -- Krzysztof Halasa, B*FH