Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yehyeong Lee" <yhlee@isslab.korea.ac.kr>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] scsi: libiscsi: validate the ITT reflected in a Reject PDU
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2026 02:12:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-162584@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261007015842.634893-3-yhlee@isslab.korea.ac.kr>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] scsi: libiscsi: TOCTOU race allows malicious target to corrupt SCSI task via Reject PDU
--

commit 0da359490f3ff756111324f1c5b68673b764be99
Author: Yehyeong Lee <yhlee@isslab.korea.ac.kr>

scsi: libiscsi: validate the ITT reflected in a Reject PDU

This commit adds validation to the ITT reflected in a Reject PDU to prevent
naming an unused or free task from the pool. It introduces checks to ensure
the task state is not ISCSI_TASK_FREE and that task->sc is NULL.

> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c b/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c
> index 7a74bc697d23b..ffd6446d07b28 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c
> @@ -1142,13 +1142,15 @@ static int iscsi_handle_reject(struct iscsi_conn *conn, struct iscsi_hdr *hdr,
>  			spin_unlock(&conn->session->frwd_lock);
>  			spin_lock(&conn->session->back_lock);
>  		} else {
> -			struct iscsi_task *task;
> +			struct iscsi_task *task = NULL;
>  			/*
>  			 * Our nop as ping got dropped. We know the target
>  			 * and transport are ok so just clean up
>  			 */
> -			task = iscsi_itt_to_task(conn, rejected_pdu.itt);
> -			if (!task) {
> +			if (!iscsi_verify_itt(conn, rejected_pdu.itt))
> +				task = iscsi_itt_to_task(conn, rejected_pdu.itt);
> +			if (!task || task->state == ISCSI_TASK_FREE ||
> +			    task->sc) {

[Severity: High]
Does this introduce a Time-of-Check to Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race with task
allocation?

The RX path executing iscsi_handle_reject() holds the session->back_lock,
while the TX path executing iscsi_alloc_task() holds the session->frwd_lock.

During task allocation, iscsi_alloc_task() performs these updates
sequentially:

iscsi_alloc_task() {
    ...
    task->state = ISCSI_TASK_PENDING;
    task->conn = conn;
    task->sc = sc;
    ...
}

Because these paths hold different locks, the RX path can observe an
incomplete task allocation where task->state is ISCSI_TASK_PENDING but
task->sc has not yet been assigned and is still NULL.

If a malicious target sends an ISCSI_OP_REJECT PDU matching the ITT of a task
currently being allocated, couldn't this check be completely bypassed?

This would falsely identify an in-flight SCSI task as a management task,
leading to premature completion via iscsi_nop_out_rsp().

This could eventually cause a refcount underflow and use-after-free when the
task actually completes.

>  				iscsi_conn_printk(KERN_ERR, conn,
>  						 "Invalid pdu reject. Could "
>  						 "not lookup rejected task.\n");

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261007015842.634893-1-yhlee@isslab.korea.ac.kr?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-07  2:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-07  1:58 [PATCH v3 0/3] scsi: libiscsi: validate task lookups driven by target-supplied ITTs Yehyeong Lee
2026-10-07  1:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] scsi: libiscsi: reject a negative task index from parse_pdu_itt Yehyeong Lee
2026-10-07  1:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] scsi: libiscsi: validate the ITT reflected in a Reject PDU Yehyeong Lee
2026-10-07  2:12   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-07  3:17   ` Yehyeong Lee
2026-10-07  1:58 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] scsi: libiscsi: validate the task named by a management response Yehyeong Lee
2026-10-07  2:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-07  3:17   ` Yehyeong Lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-162584@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=yhlee@isslab.korea.ac.kr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox