From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yehyeong Lee" <yhlee@isslab.korea.ac.kr>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] scsi: libiscsi: validate the ITT reflected in a Reject PDU
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2026 02:12:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-162584@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261007015842.634893-3-yhlee@isslab.korea.ac.kr>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] scsi: libiscsi: TOCTOU race allows malicious target to corrupt SCSI task via Reject PDU
--
commit 0da359490f3ff756111324f1c5b68673b764be99
Author: Yehyeong Lee <yhlee@isslab.korea.ac.kr>
scsi: libiscsi: validate the ITT reflected in a Reject PDU
This commit adds validation to the ITT reflected in a Reject PDU to prevent
naming an unused or free task from the pool. It introduces checks to ensure
the task state is not ISCSI_TASK_FREE and that task->sc is NULL.
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c b/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c
> index 7a74bc697d23b..ffd6446d07b28 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c
> @@ -1142,13 +1142,15 @@ static int iscsi_handle_reject(struct iscsi_conn *conn, struct iscsi_hdr *hdr,
> spin_unlock(&conn->session->frwd_lock);
> spin_lock(&conn->session->back_lock);
> } else {
> - struct iscsi_task *task;
> + struct iscsi_task *task = NULL;
> /*
> * Our nop as ping got dropped. We know the target
> * and transport are ok so just clean up
> */
> - task = iscsi_itt_to_task(conn, rejected_pdu.itt);
> - if (!task) {
> + if (!iscsi_verify_itt(conn, rejected_pdu.itt))
> + task = iscsi_itt_to_task(conn, rejected_pdu.itt);
> + if (!task || task->state == ISCSI_TASK_FREE ||
> + task->sc) {
[Severity: High]
Does this introduce a Time-of-Check to Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race with task
allocation?
The RX path executing iscsi_handle_reject() holds the session->back_lock,
while the TX path executing iscsi_alloc_task() holds the session->frwd_lock.
During task allocation, iscsi_alloc_task() performs these updates
sequentially:
iscsi_alloc_task() {
...
task->state = ISCSI_TASK_PENDING;
task->conn = conn;
task->sc = sc;
...
}
Because these paths hold different locks, the RX path can observe an
incomplete task allocation where task->state is ISCSI_TASK_PENDING but
task->sc has not yet been assigned and is still NULL.
If a malicious target sends an ISCSI_OP_REJECT PDU matching the ITT of a task
currently being allocated, couldn't this check be completely bypassed?
This would falsely identify an in-flight SCSI task as a management task,
leading to premature completion via iscsi_nop_out_rsp().
This could eventually cause a refcount underflow and use-after-free when the
task actually completes.
> iscsi_conn_printk(KERN_ERR, conn,
> "Invalid pdu reject. Could "
> "not lookup rejected task.\n");
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261007015842.634893-1-yhlee@isslab.korea.ac.kr?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-07 2:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-07 1:58 [PATCH v3 0/3] scsi: libiscsi: validate task lookups driven by target-supplied ITTs Yehyeong Lee
2026-10-07 1:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] scsi: libiscsi: reject a negative task index from parse_pdu_itt Yehyeong Lee
2026-10-07 1:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] scsi: libiscsi: validate the ITT reflected in a Reject PDU Yehyeong Lee
2026-10-07 2:12 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-07 3:17 ` Yehyeong Lee
2026-10-07 1:58 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] scsi: libiscsi: validate the task named by a management response Yehyeong Lee
2026-10-07 2:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-07 3:17 ` Yehyeong Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-162584@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=yhlee@isslab.korea.ac.kr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox