From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Olivier Kaloudoff" <olivier.kaloudoff@gmail.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: uas: validate status URB length before parsing the IU
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 11:09:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-171177@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261014105526.16392-1-olivier.kaloudoff@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] usb/uas: short STATUS IUs (4-15 bytes) falsely complete as SUCCESS
--
commit 1a208f3daab26d0bf253bfe97e68d1636d90a96c
Author: Olivier Kaloudoff <olivier.kaloudoff@gmail.com>
usb: uas: validate status URB length before parsing the IU
The commit attempts to fix log spam caused by parsing a short or empty status
URB transfer. It does so by bailing out if actual_length is smaller than
sizeof(struct iu), which is only 4 bytes long.
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c b/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c
> index 8655edbd66b16..b5d3071d86c84 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c
> @@ -315,6 +315,13 @@ static void uas_stat_cmplt(struct urb *urb)
> goto bail;
> }
>
> + if (urb->actual_length < sizeof(struct iu)) {
[Severity: High]
Does this allow 4-15 byte packets to proceed to type-specific processing?
Because sizeof(struct iu) is only 4 bytes, a packet of 4-15 bytes with
iu_id == IU_ID_STATUS (3) passes this check.
If that occurs, uas_stat_cmplt() delegates to uas_sense():
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c:uas_sense() {
...
if (urb->actual_length > 16) {
...
}
cmnd->result = sense_iu->status;
}
Since the transfer buffer is zero-allocated and not completely overwritten by
the short transfer, sense_iu->status at offset 6 reads as 0 (SAM_STAT_GOOD).
Does this result in the command falsely completing as SUCCESS and hiding
device errors from the SCSI block layer?
> + dev_err_ratelimited(&urb->dev->dev,
> + "stat urb: short transfer (%u bytes)\n",
> + urb->actual_length);
> + goto bail;
> + }
> +
> idx = be16_to_cpup(&iu->tag) - 1;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&devinfo->lock, flags);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261014105526.16392-1-olivier.kaloudoff@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-13 22:19 [PATCH] usb: uas: validate status URB length before parsing the IU Olivier Kaloudoff
2026-10-14 4:59 ` Greg KH
2026-10-14 10:55 ` [PATCH v2] " Olivier Kaloudoff
2026-10-14 11:09 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-14 16:56 ` [PATCH v3] " Olivier Kaloudoff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-171177@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olivier.kaloudoff@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox