From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 06/12] zloop: fix zone reporting consistency
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2026 10:06:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-204780@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261109095144.819709-7-dlemoal@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Medium] zloop: inconsistent empty zone report in zloop_report_zones()
--
commit 2a1f79e0caf4e50f76c7d14b20ef44343010c188
Author: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
zloop: fix zone reporting consistency
This commit moves the read of zone->cond inside zone->wp_lock in
zloop_report_zones() so that blkz.wp and blkz.cond are populated while
holding the same spinlock.
> diff --git a/drivers/block/zloop.c b/drivers/block/zloop.c
> index 65634a39b0bfc..e1ad7513fea9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/zloop.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/zloop.c
> @@ -992,8 +992,8 @@ static int zloop_report_zones(struct gendisk *disk, sector_t sector,
> blkz.len = zlo->zone_size;
> spin_lock(&zone->wp_lock);
> blkz.wp = zone->wp;
> - spin_unlock(&zone->wp_lock);
> blkz.cond = zone->cond;
> + spin_unlock(&zone->wp_lock);
> if (test_bit(ZLOOP_ZONE_CONV, &zone->flags)) {
> blkz.type = BLK_ZONE_TYPE_CONVENTIONAL;
> blkz.capacity = zlo->zone_size;
[Severity: Medium]
Can zloop_report_zones() still report blkz.cond == BLK_ZONE_COND_EMPTY
with blkz.wp > blkz.start when ordered_zone_append is enabled?
When a zone append to an empty zone does not fill the zone,
zloop_set_zone_append_sector() advances zone->wp under zone->wp_lock,
while transitioning zone->cond to BLK_ZONE_COND_IMP_OPEN via
zloop_do_open_zone() only happens later in the workqueue:
drivers/block/zloop.c:zloop_set_zone_append_sector() {
...
rq->__sector = zone->wp;
zone->wp += blk_rq_sectors(rq);
if (zone->wp >= zone_end)
zloop_mark_full(zlo, zone);
spin_unlock(&zone->wp_lock);
...
}
CPU0 CPU1 (kworker)
zloop_queue_rq()
zloop_set_zone_append_sector()
spin_lock(&zone->wp_lock)
zone->wp += blk_rq_sectors(rq)
spin_unlock(&zone->wp_lock)
queue_work(..., &cmd->work)
zloop_report_zones()
mutex_lock(&zone->lock)
spin_lock(&zone->wp_lock)
blkz.wp = zone->wp;
blkz.cond = zone->cond; <-- still BLK_ZONE_COND_EMPTY
spin_unlock(&zone->wp_lock)
zloop_rw()
zloop_seq_write_prep()
mutex_lock(&zone->lock)
zloop_do_open_zone()
Reporting BLK_ZONE_COND_EMPTY with an advanced write pointer causes
disk_report_zone() -> disk_zone_wplug_sync_state() ->
blk_zone_wp_offset() to treat the write pointer offset as 0 instead of
blkz.wp - blkz.start.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261109095144.819709-1-dlemoal@kernel.org?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-09 9:51 [PATCH v8 00/12] Add support for storage element depopulation Damien Le Moal
2026-11-09 9:51 ` [PATCH v8 01/12] block: introduce disk_zone_is_offline() Damien Le Moal
2026-11-09 9:51 ` [PATCH v8 02/12] block: refactor blk_revalidate_disk_zones() Damien Le Moal
2026-11-09 9:51 ` [PATCH v8 03/12] block: allow dropping all zone write plugs on revalidation Damien Le Moal
2026-11-09 11:13 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-11-11 15:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-11-09 9:51 ` [PATCH v8 04/12] block: introduce storage element management Damien Le Moal
2026-11-09 11:14 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-11-11 15:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-11-09 9:51 ` [PATCH v8 05/12] block: add storage element management ioctls Damien Le Moal
2026-11-09 11:15 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-11-11 15:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-11-09 9:51 ` [PATCH v8 06/12] zloop: fix zone reporting consistency Damien Le Moal
2026-11-09 10:06 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-09 11:16 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-11-11 15:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-11-09 9:51 ` [PATCH v8 07/12] zloop: add storage element emulation Damien Le Moal
2026-11-09 10:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 11:17 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-11-09 9:51 ` [PATCH v8 08/12] zloop: add degrade_element control command Damien Le Moal
2026-11-09 9:51 ` [PATCH v8 09/12] scsi: scsi_proto: refine the definition of storage element health Damien Le Moal
2026-11-09 11:17 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-11-11 15:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-11-09 9:51 ` [PATCH v8 10/12] scsi: sd_zbc: always revalidate zones for disks supporting head depopulation Damien Le Moal
2026-11-09 11:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-11-11 15:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-11-09 9:51 ` [PATCH v8 11/12] scsi: sd_zbc: define storage element management operations Damien Le Moal
2026-11-09 10:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 11:21 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-11-09 9:51 ` [PATCH v8 12/12] scsi: sd: fail read commands to offline zones early Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-204780@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox