Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sarthak Kukreti" <sarthakkukreti@google.com>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] usb: uas: complete inflight commands on status URB error
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 01:02:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-212028@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261113003536.3622755-2-sarthakkukreti@google.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential
issues to consider:
- [High] usb: uas: uas_stat_cmplt() orphans status URBs in
  devinfo->sense_urbs
- [Medium] usb: uas: uas_stat_cmplt() sets DID_NO_CONNECT on
  non-disconnect errors
- [Medium] usb: uas: uas_stat_cmplt() skips commands without
  COMMAND_INFLIGHT
- [Medium] usb: uas: uas_stat_cmplt() drops lock mid-loop and aborts new
  commands
It also noticed 1 related pre-existing issue this patch does not
introduce:
- [Critical] usb: uas: unvalidated IU length causes false success in
  uas_sense() [1]
--

commit feee884d21c2440f5410ec8ac6400834915e4ef7
Author: Sarthak Kukreti <sarthakkukreti@google.com>

usb: uas: complete inflight commands on status URB error

This commit completes inflight SCSI commands with DID_NO_CONNECT and unlinks
their data URBs when a status URB fails with a non-unlink error in
uas_stat_cmplt(), while preserving existing non-DID_OK host status bytes in
uas_data_cmplt().

> diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c b/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c
> index 8655edbd66b16..3aadf4c88c5c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c
> @@ -310,9 +310,49 @@ static void uas_stat_cmplt(struct urb *urb)
>  	bool success;
>  
>  	if (status) {
> -		if (status != -ENOENT && status != -ECONNRESET && status != -ESHUTDOWN)
> +		if (status == -ENOENT || status == -ECONNRESET)
> +			goto bail;
> +		if (status != -ESHUTDOWN)
>  			dev_err(&urb->dev->dev, "stat urb: status %d\n", status);
> -		goto bail;
> +
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&devinfo->lock, flags);
> +		if (devinfo->resetting)
> +			goto out;
> +
> +		for (idx = 0; idx < devinfo->qdepth; idx++) {
> +			cmnd = devinfo->cmnd[idx];
> +			if (!cmnd)
> +				continue;
> +			cmdinfo = scsi_cmd_priv(cmnd);
> +			if (!(cmdinfo->state & COMMAND_INFLIGHT))
> +				continue;

[Severity: Medium]
Does skipping commands without COMMAND_INFLIGHT leave partially submitted
commands in devinfo->cmnd[] hung?

In uas_submit_urbs(), uas_submit_sense_urb() submits the status URB and
clears SUBMIT_STATUS_URB before the data and command URBs are submitted.
If a data URB is submitted and cmd_urb submission then fails with -ENODEV,
uas_queuecommand_lck() records cmnd in devinfo->cmnd[idx] with
SUBMIT_CMD_URB still set and COMMAND_INFLIGHT unset:

drivers/usb/storage/uas.c:uas_queuecommand_lck() {
	...
	if (err == -ENODEV) {
		if (cmdinfo->state & (COMMAND_INFLIGHT | DATA_IN_URB_INFLIGHT |
				DATA_OUT_URB_INFLIGHT))
			goto out;
	...
out:
	devinfo->cmnd[idx] = cmnd;
}

When that command's status URB fails here, uas_stat_cmplt() skips it
because COMMAND_INFLIGHT is not set, and when its data URB finishes in
uas_data_cmplt(), the SUBMIT_CMD_URB check also skips uas_try_complete(),
leaving the command pending until the SCSI timeout fires.  Similarly, if
uas_submit_urbs() queued the command to devinfo->work after submitting the
status URB, skipping it here consumes the status URB before uas_do_work()
submits cmd_urb, and if an inflight command has IS_IN_WORK_LIST set, not
clearing IS_IN_WORK_LIST before dropping devinfo->lock below allows
uas_do_work() to resubmit URBs for the command being aborted.

> +
> +			if (cmdinfo->state & DATA_IN_URB_INFLIGHT)
> +				data_in_urb = usb_get_urb(cmdinfo->data_in_urb);
> +			if (cmdinfo->state & DATA_OUT_URB_INFLIGHT)
> +				data_out_urb = usb_get_urb(cmdinfo->data_out_urb);
> +			cmdinfo->state &= ~COMMAND_INFLIGHT;
> +			set_host_byte(cmnd, DID_NO_CONNECT);

[Severity: Medium]
Should non-disconnect status URB errors set DID_ERROR instead of
DID_NO_CONNECT?

This branch runs for any status URB error other than -ENOENT and
-ECONNRESET, including endpoint stalls (-EPIPE) and transient USB transfer
errors (-EPROTO, -EILSEQ, -ETIME) on a still-connected device.
Because scsi_decide_disposition() treats DID_NO_CONNECT as an immediate
non-retryable failure without invoking SCSI error recovery, all inflight
block I/O fails immediately with -EIO, a stalled status endpoint is never
reset, and sd_sync_cache() (which ignores DID_NO_CONNECT) silently reports
a failed SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE as successful.

> +			uas_try_complete(cmnd, __func__);

[Severity: High]
When multiple commands are in flight and one status URB fails, does
completing every command in devinfo->cmnd[] without unlinking
devinfo->sense_urbs orphan the remaining commands' status URBs?

Each submitted command allocates its own status URB anchored in
devinfo->sense_urbs (bound to stream_id = cmdinfo->uas_tag when USB 3.0
streams are enabled).  When one status URB fails, this loop clears
devinfo->cmnd[idx] and calls scsi_done() for all other inflight commands
while their status URBs remain active in the HCD.

Those still-anchored status URBs cause uas_wait_for_pending_cmnds() in
uas_suspend() and uas_pre_reset() to time out waiting on
devinfo->sense_urbs after 5 seconds.  In addition, if another SCSI command
is queued before the orphaned status URB finishes, it reuses the freed
tag slot in devinfo->cmnd[idx]:

CPU0                                  CPU1
uas_stat_cmplt(urb_A)
  /* fails with -EPROTO */
  /* completes cmnd_B at idx = 1 */
  devinfo->cmnd[1] = NULL
  scsi_done(cmnd_B)
                                      uas_queuecommand_lck(cmnd_C)
                                        /* reuses idx = 1, submits urb_C */
                                        devinfo->cmnd[1] = cmnd_C
uas_stat_cmplt(urb_B)
  /* orphaned status URB for idx = 1 */
  uas_try_complete(cmnd_C)            <-- completes cmnd_C prematurely

> +
> +			if (data_in_urb || data_out_urb) {
> +				spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devinfo->lock, flags);
> +				if (data_in_urb) {
> +					usb_unlink_urb(data_in_urb);
> +					usb_put_urb(data_in_urb);
> +					data_in_urb = NULL;
> +				}
> +				if (data_out_urb) {
> +					usb_unlink_urb(data_out_urb);
> +					usb_put_urb(data_out_urb);
> +					data_out_urb = NULL;
> +				}
> +				spin_lock_irqsave(&devinfo->lock, flags);
> +				if (devinfo->resetting)
> +					break;
> +			}
> +		}
> +		goto out;
>  	}
>  
>  	idx = be16_to_cpup(&iu->tag) - 1;

[Severity: Medium]
Can dropping devinfo->lock inside the loop cause later iterations to abort
newly queued commands?

When a command at slot idx has a data URB in flight, uas_stat_cmplt()
drops devinfo->lock to call usb_unlink_urb() and then continues scanning
higher indices:

CPU0                                  CPU1
uas_stat_cmplt()
  /* idx = 0 has data_in_urb */
  spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devinfo->lock)
  usb_unlink_urb(data_in_urb)
                                      uas_queuecommand_lck()
                                        /* places new cmd at idx = 1 */
                                        devinfo->cmnd[1] = new_cmnd
  spin_lock_irqsave(&devinfo->lock)
  /* loop advances to idx = 1 */
  set_host_byte(new_cmnd, DID_NO_CONNECT)
  uas_try_complete(new_cmnd, ...)     <-- aborts newly queued command

[Severity: Critical]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but can a truncated status
IU in uas_stat_cmplt() cause uas_sense() to report a failed command as
SAM_STAT_GOOD [1]?

When status is 0, uas_stat_cmplt() dispatches IU_ID_STATUS to uas_sense()
without checking urb->actual_length:

drivers/usb/storage/uas.c:uas_sense() {
	struct sense_iu *sense_iu = urb->transfer_buffer;
	struct scsi_device *sdev = cmnd->device;

	if (urb->actual_length > 16) {
		...
	}

	cmnd->result = sense_iu->status;
}

Because the status URB transfer buffer is allocated with kzalloc(), a
short packet of 4 to 6 bytes has a valid iu_id and tag while
sense_iu->status at offset 6 remains zero (SAM_STAT_GOOD), completing the
command as successful and silently corrupting read or write I/O.

[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-78c5dae0-c194-40ff-a554-3a4de1859b86

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261113003536.3622755-1-sarthakkukreti@google.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-13  1:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-13  0:35 [PATCH 0/3] usb: uas / scsi: fail inflight and queued commands on dead links Sarthak Kukreti
2026-11-13  0:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] usb: uas: complete inflight commands on status URB error Sarthak Kukreti
2026-11-13  1:02   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-13  0:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] usb: uas: fail command submission on fatal USB errors Sarthak Kukreti
2026-11-13  0:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13  0:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] scsi: core: do not retry passthrough requests on disconnected targets Sarthak Kukreti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-212028@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sarthakkukreti@google.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox