From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hongyan Xu" <getshell@seu.edu.cn>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: lpfc: drain all CQ work before releasing queue dependencies
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2026 12:18:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-215487@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179474327480.103840.7747335244166055751@seu.edu.cn>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issues to consider:
- [High] scsi: lpfc: UAF on cq->pring in lpfc_sli4_queue_unset() before
CQ work drain
- [High] scsi: lpfc: incomplete IRQ and CQ work drain in
lpfc_sli4_queue_destroy()
--
commit a82bf087615a1eaf204b24247167186d3c756921
Author: Hongyan Xu <getshell@seu.edu.cn>
scsi: lpfc: drain all CQ work before releasing queue dependencies
This commit disables delayed CQ work items and flushes the HBA workqueue
before freeing queues in lpfc_sli4_queue_destroy(), and moves interrupt
teardown ahead of queue destruction in lpfc_sli4_prep_dev_for_reset().
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260928134154.1595-1-getshell@seu.edu.cn/
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
> index 6df5f4e7c5d65..0724dd8dcc02f 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
> @@ -10808,6 +10808,37 @@ lpfc_sli4_release_queues(struct lpfc_queue ***qs, int max)
> *qs = NULL;
> }
>
> +static void lpfc_sli4_disable_cq_work(struct lpfc_queue *cq)
> +{
> + if (!cq)
> + return;
> +
> + disable_delayed_work_sync(&cq->sched_irqwork);
> + disable_delayed_work_sync(&cq->sched_spwork);
> +}
> +
> +static void lpfc_sli4_drain_cq_work(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
> +{
> + struct lpfc_sli4_hba *sli4 = &phba->sli4_hba;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + if (sli4->hdwq)
> + for (i = 0; i < phba->cfg_hdw_queue; i++)
> + lpfc_sli4_disable_cq_work(sli4->hdwq[i].io_cq);
> +
> + if (sli4->nvmet_cqset)
> + for (i = 0; i < phba->cfg_nvmet_mrq; i++)
> + lpfc_sli4_disable_cq_work(sli4->nvmet_cqset[i]);
> +
> + lpfc_sli4_disable_cq_work(sli4->els_cq);
> + lpfc_sli4_disable_cq_work(sli4->nvmels_cq);
> + lpfc_sli4_disable_cq_work(sli4->mbx_cq);
> +
> + /* Direct CQ work cannot rearm the disabled delayed work. */
> + if (phba->wq)
> + flush_workqueue(phba->wq);
> +}
[Severity: High]
Can a threaded IRQ handler still access or queue CQ work after
lpfc_sli4_drain_cq_work() returns?
For MSI-X, lpfc_sli4_hba_intr_handler_th() runs in a dedicated IRQ kthread
outside phba->wq, calls __lpfc_sli4_hba_process_cq() directly for fast-path
CQs, and queues cq->spwork onto phba->wq for slow-path CQs. Callers such as
lpfc_sli4_hba_setup() (on failure after lpfc_sli4_arm_cqeq_intr()) and
lpfc_sli_brdrestart_s4() invoke lpfc_sli4_queue_destroy() without disabling or
synchronizing interrupts first, and lpfc_sli4_disable_cq_work() does not call
disable_work_sync() on cq->irqwork or cq->spwork:
CPU0 CPU1 (irq kthread)
lpfc_sli4_hba_setup()
lpfc_sli4_arm_cqeq_intr(phba)
...
lpfc_sli4_queue_destroy(phba)
lpfc_sli4_drain_cq_work(phba)
flush_workqueue(phba->wq)
lpfc_sli4_hba_intr_handler_th()
lpfc_sli4_process_eq()
__lpfc_sli4_hba_process_cq(cq)
lpfc_sli4_release_hdwq(phba)
lpfc_sli4_queue_free(cq)
kfree(cq)
... <-- use-after-free
Synchronizing active interrupt handlers before draining and calling
disable_work_sync() on cq->irqwork and cq->spwork in
lpfc_sli4_disable_cq_work() would prevent this race.
>
> static inline void
> lpfc_sli4_release_hdwq(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
> {
> @@ -10868,6 +10899,7 @@ lpfc_sli4_queue_destroy(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
> spin_unlock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
>
> lpfc_sli4_cleanup_poll_list(phba);
> + lpfc_sli4_drain_cq_work(phba);
>
> /* Release HBA eqs */
> if (phba->sli4_hba.hdwq)
[Severity: High]
Does draining CQ work only inside lpfc_sli4_queue_destroy() leave a
use-after-free window on cq->pring during lpfc_sli4_queue_unset()?
In lpfc_sli4_hba_unset(), lpfc_sli_brdrestart_s4(), and the
lpfc_sli4_hba_setup() error path, lpfc_sli4_queue_unset() runs before
lpfc_sli4_queue_destroy() while delayed CQ timers (cq->sched_irqwork and
cq->sched_spwork) can still be pending. Inside lpfc_sli4_queue_unset(),
lpfc_wq_destroy() frees wq->pring, which cq->pring aliases:
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c:lpfc_wq_destroy() {
...
list_del_init(&wq->list);
kfree(wq->pring);
wq->pring = NULL;
...
}
CPU0 CPU1 (kworker)
lpfc_sli4_hba_unset()
lpfc_sli4_queue_unset(phba)
lpfc_wq_destroy(phba, wq)
kfree(wq->pring)
lpfc_sli4_dly_hba_process_cq()
...
lpfc_sli4_fp_handle_fcp_wcqe()
pring = cq->pring;
spin_lock_irqsave(&pring->ring_lock)
<-- use-after-free
lpfc_sli4_queue_destroy(phba)
lpfc_sli4_drain_cq_work(phba)
Draining CQ work before lpfc_sli4_queue_unset() tears down WQ state and rings
would close this window.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/179474327480.103840.7747335244166055751@seu.edu.cn?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-15 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-15 11:47 [PATCH v2] scsi: lpfc: drain all CQ work before releasing queue dependencies Hongyan Xu
2026-11-15 12:18 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-215487@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=getshell@seu.edu.cn \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox