From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jes Sorensen Subject: Re: [announce] scsi_id 0.1 - generate unique scsi id Date: 23 Oct 2003 03:33:32 -0400 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: References: <20031021165857.A8240@beaverton.ibm.com> <20031022153140.A22298@infradead.org> <1066808536.27285.19.camel@w-stekloff.beaverton.ibm.com> <20031022154638.A22952@infradead.org> <1066809889.27285.36.camel@w-stekloff.beaverton.ibm.com> <20031022155231.GQ18370@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20031022091519.A11995@beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from jaguar.mkp.net ([192.139.46.146]:6604 "EHLO jaguar.mkp.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261305AbTJWHiM (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2003 03:38:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20031022091519.A11995@beaverton.ibm.com> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Patrick Mansfield Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Daniel Stekloff , Christoph Hellwig , linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "Patrick" == Patrick Mansfield writes: Patrick> On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 04:52:31PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox Patrick> wrote: >> You shouldn't be installing them into the namespace, that's >> basically owned by POSIX. How about instead? Patrick> I incorrectly suggested we should use . Patrick> Should we use , rather than another new directory? Rule of thumb: any existing hierachy is reserved, either you want to drop it in header root, ie. /usr/include or /usr/loca/include or you want to create your own hierachy, as Matthew suggested looks like a good candidate to me. Cheers, Jes