From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mpt3sas: mpt3sas_scsih_enclosure_find_by_handle can be static Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 17:54:35 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1521540956-42347-1-git-send-email-chaitra.basappa@broadcom.com> <20180320210652.GA40906@xian> <289588bbff4dc0d35e519d0c4d4282da78cc6121.camel@wdc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <289588bbff4dc0d35e519d0c4d4282da78cc6121.camel@wdc.com> (Bart Van Assche's message of "Tue, 27 Mar 2018 18:55:19 +0000") Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Bart Van Assche Cc: "chaitra.basappa@broadcom.com" , "lkp@intel.com" , "kbuild-all@01.org" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "Sathya.Prakash@broadcom.com" , "suganath-prabu.subramani@broadcom.com" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "jaco@uls.co.za" List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Bart, > Are you aware that if the 0-day test infrastructure suggests an improvement > for a patch that the patch that that improvement applies to gets ignored > unless either the patch is reposted with the improvement applied or that it > is explained why the suggested improvement is inappropriate? Correct. I don't apply anything that causes a 0-day warning. The patch will be closed with "Changes Required" status in patchwork. Always build patch submissions to linux-scsi with: make C=1 CF="-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__" -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering