From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Make use of UFS_BIT macro wherever possible Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 15:31:16 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1503922783-14317-1-git-send-email-alim.akhtar@samsung.com> <1503935147.2841.25.camel@wdc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: (Alim Akhtar's message of "Mon, 11 Sep 2017 08:14:37 +0530") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Alim Akhtar Cc: Alim Akhtar , Bart Van Assche , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "martin.petersen@oracle.com" , Arnd Bergmann , "vinholikatti@gmail.com" List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Alim, > Should I drop this patch and send another one which removes UFS_BIT() > macro? I fail to see the point of UFS_BIT(). So yes. Please make sure to CC: Subhash on ufs changes. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering