* Re: 520 BPS data integrity vendors
[not found] <AANLkTilcpFgsYtEUkZ2zAU3SDs0jetiajYPzKUWgFMyD@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2010-07-02 18:06 ` James Bottomley
2010-07-03 1:03 ` Dan Porat
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2010-07-02 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Porat; +Cc: linux-ide, linux-scsi
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 17:11 -0400, Dan Porat wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> In the documentation of 2.6.34 it says "We have been working with
> several FC/SAS HBA vendors to enable the protection information to be
> transferred to and from their controllers"
> I would like to test SAS 520.
So I'm having a little difficulty parsing this: SAS 520 is actually a
financial audit standard (which I really wish I didn't know about) ... I
assume you're actually talking about DIF/DIX? The integrity standard
for SCSI?
> Which Vendor and what specific SAS HBA model will support it ?
> Thanks
I've added linux-scsi, since this is a SCSI question not an IDE one.
The only SAS HBA supporting DIF I know of with a working Linux driver is
the mpt2sas. It supports DIF types 1 and 3.
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 520 BPS data integrity vendors
2010-07-02 18:06 ` 520 BPS data integrity vendors James Bottomley
@ 2010-07-03 1:03 ` Dan Porat
2010-07-03 7:33 ` Martin K. Petersen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Dan Porat @ 2010-07-03 1:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Bottomley; +Cc: linux-ide, linux-scsi
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 2:06 PM, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de> wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 17:11 -0400, Dan Porat wrote:
>> Hi ,
>>
>> In the documentation of 2.6.34 it says "We have been working with
>> several FC/SAS HBA vendors to enable the protection information to be
>> transferred to and from their controllers"
>> I would like to test SAS 520.
>
> So I'm having a little difficulty parsing this: SAS 520 is actually a
> financial audit standard (which I really wish I didn't know about) ... I
> assume you're actually talking about DIF/DIX? The integrity standard
> for SCSI?
>
>>>You are right on the money.
>>>I mean DIF/DIX .
>>>The final purpose it to run a SATA 520 through a DIF supporting HBA , and a SAS/SATA dongle (interposer card).
>>>As initial stage we would like to check SAS DIF field.
>>>Afterwards just put it through a dongle to a SATA 520 sector size drive.
>> Which Vendor and what specific SAS HBA model will support it ?
>> Thanks
>
> I've added linux-scsi, since this is a SCSI question not an IDE one.
>
> The only SAS HBA supporting DIF I know of with a working Linux driver is
> the mpt2sas. It supports DIF types 1 and 3.
>
>>Would you know of any specific LSI SAS/HBAmodel which will support SCSI DIF/DIX ?
> James
>
>
>
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 520 BPS data integrity vendors
2010-07-03 1:03 ` Dan Porat
@ 2010-07-03 7:33 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-07-06 18:01 ` Dan Porat
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Martin K. Petersen @ 2010-07-03 7:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Porat; +Cc: James Bottomley, linux-ide, linux-scsi
>>>>> "Dan" == Dan Porat <dan.porat@gmail.com> writes:
>>> Would you know of any specific LSI SAS/HBAmodel which will support
>>> SCSI DIF/DIX ?
LSI's 92xx series HBAs have the LSISAS2008 chip that's required for DIF
operation. These boards do not support DIX.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 520 BPS data integrity vendors
2010-07-03 7:33 ` Martin K. Petersen
@ 2010-07-06 18:01 ` Dan Porat
2010-07-06 18:53 ` Martin K. Petersen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Dan Porat @ 2010-07-06 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin K. Petersen; +Cc: James Bottomley, linux-ide, linux-scsi
We checked with kernel 2.6.34 , Seagate Cheetah 15K and the following HBA:
LSI 9212-4i4e
Still , no success.
Any Ideas?
Thanks
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 3:33 AM, Martin K. Petersen
<martin.petersen@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>> "Dan" == Dan Porat <dan.porat@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >>> Would you know of any specific LSI SAS/HBAmodel which will support
> >>> SCSI DIF/DIX ?
>
> LSI's 92xx series HBAs have the LSISAS2008 chip that's required for DIF
> operation. These boards do not support DIX.
>
> --
> Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 520 BPS data integrity vendors
2010-07-06 18:01 ` Dan Porat
@ 2010-07-06 18:53 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-07-07 10:34 ` Dan Porat
2010-07-15 10:08 ` Dan Porat
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Martin K. Petersen @ 2010-07-06 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Porat; +Cc: Martin K. Petersen, James Bottomley, linux-ide, linux-scsi
>>>>> "Dan" == Dan Porat <dan.porat@gmail.com> writes:
Dan> We checked with kernel 2.6.34 , Seagate Cheetah 15K and the
Dan> following HBA: LSI 9212-4i4e
Dan> Still , no success.
Send us the output of:
# lsscsi -p
# sg_inq -x /dev/sdN
# sg_readcap -l /dev/sdN
Dan> Any Ideas?
And you are sure that the drive is formatted with DIF? Seagate's
standard firmware doesn't support it, fwiw. It's a build-to-order
option.
Hitachi drives support DIF out of the box.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 520 BPS data integrity vendors
2010-07-06 18:53 ` Martin K. Petersen
@ 2010-07-07 10:34 ` Dan Porat
2010-07-08 15:51 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-07-15 10:08 ` Dan Porat
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Dan Porat @ 2010-07-07 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin K. Petersen; +Cc: James Bottomley, linux-ide, linux-scsi
Hi,
Thanks for the elaborate answer.
We want to buy the drive which supports (rather than currently
investigating , probably your assumption is right and our seagate does
not have the required FW).
Regarding the specific model ,
Will any of those do ?
HUS151414VL3800
HUS151473VL3800
HUS151436VL3800
HUS151414VL3600
HUS151473VL3600
HUS151436VL3600
Thanks
Dan Porat
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Martin K. Petersen
<martin.petersen@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>> "Dan" == Dan Porat <dan.porat@gmail.com> writes:
>
> Dan> We checked with kernel 2.6.34 , Seagate Cheetah 15K and the
> Dan> following HBA: LSI 9212-4i4e
>
> Dan> Still , no success.
>
> Send us the output of:
>
> # lsscsi -p
> # sg_inq -x /dev/sdN
> # sg_readcap -l /dev/sdN
>
>
> Dan> Any Ideas?
>
> And you are sure that the drive is formatted with DIF? Seagate's
> standard firmware doesn't support it, fwiw. It's a build-to-order
> option.
>
> Hitachi drives support DIF out of the box.
>
> --
> Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 520 BPS data integrity vendors
2010-07-07 10:34 ` Dan Porat
@ 2010-07-08 15:51 ` Martin K. Petersen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Martin K. Petersen @ 2010-07-08 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Porat; +Cc: Martin K. Petersen, James Bottomley, linux-ide, linux-scsi
>>>>> "Dan" == Dan Porat <dan.porat@gmail.com> writes:
Dan> Regarding the specific model , Will any of those do ?
Dan> HUS151414VL3800 HUS151473VL3800 HUS151436VL3800 HUS151414VL3600
Dan> HUS151473VL3600 HUS151436VL3600
I'm not familiar with those specific models. But as far as I know any
SAS/FC drive shipped by Hitachi within the last 3 years is DIF-capable.
Check the datasheet for "end-2-end protection".
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 520 BPS data integrity vendors
2010-07-06 18:53 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-07-07 10:34 ` Dan Porat
@ 2010-07-15 10:08 ` Dan Porat
2010-07-15 13:47 ` Martin K. Petersen
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Dan Porat @ 2010-07-15 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin K. Petersen; +Cc: James Bottomley, linux-ide, linux-scsi
Following is the output with the Hitachi drive:
[root@fedora13 ~]# lsscsi -p
[0:0:0:0] cd/dvd hp CDDVDW TS-H653R 0E00 /dev/sr0
[1:0:0:0] disk ATA ST31000528AS CC38 /dev/sda
[6:0:0:0] disk HITACHI HUS151473VLS300 A420 /dev/sdb
[root@fedora13 ~]# sg_inq /dev/sdb
standard INQUIRY:
PQual=0 Device_type=0 RMB=0 version=0x05 [SPC-3]
[AERC=0] [TrmTsk=0] NormACA=0 HiSUP=0 Resp_data_format=2
SCCS=0 ACC=0 TPGS=0 3PC=0 Protect=0 BQue=0
EncServ=0 MultiP=1 (VS=0) [MChngr=0] [ACKREQQ=0] Addr16=0
[RelAdr=0] WBus16=0 Sync=0 Linked=0 [TranDis=0] CmdQue=1
[SPI: Clocking=0x0 QAS=0 IUS=0]
length=164 (0xa4) Peripheral device type: disk
Vendor identification: HITACHI
Product identification: HUS151473VLS300 Product revision level: A420
[root@fedora13 ~]# sg_readcap /dev/sdb
Read Capacity results:
Last logical block address=140174231 (0x85ae397), Number of blocks=140174232
Logical block length=520 bytes
Hence:
Device size: 72890600640 bytes, 69513.9 MiB, 72.89 GB
[root@fedora13 ~]#
Thanks
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Martin K. Petersen
<martin.petersen@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>> "Dan" == Dan Porat <dan.porat@gmail.com> writes:
>
> Dan> We checked with kernel 2.6.34 , Seagate Cheetah 15K and the
> Dan> following HBA: LSI 9212-4i4e
>
> Dan> Still , no success.
>
> Send us the output of:
>
> # lsscsi -p
> # sg_inq -x /dev/sdN
> # sg_readcap -l /dev/sdN
>
>
> Dan> Any Ideas?
>
> And you are sure that the drive is formatted with DIF? Seagate's
> standard firmware doesn't support it, fwiw. It's a build-to-order
> option.
>
> Hitachi drives support DIF out of the box.
>
> --
> Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 520 BPS data integrity vendors
2010-07-15 10:08 ` Dan Porat
@ 2010-07-15 13:47 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-08-05 20:39 ` Dan Porat
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Martin K. Petersen @ 2010-07-15 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Porat; +Cc: Martin K. Petersen, James Bottomley, linux-ide, linux-scsi
>>>>> "Dan" == Dan Porat <dan.porat@gmail.com> writes:
Dan> [root@fedora13 ~]# sg_inq /dev/sdb
[...]
Dan> [root@fedora13 ~]# sg_readcap /dev/sdb
[...]
I asked for EXTENDED INQUIRY and READ CAPACITY(16).
# sg_inq -x /dev/sdb
# sg_readcap -l /dev/sdb
It does not look like you have reformatted the drive, though...
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 520 BPS data integrity vendors
2010-07-15 13:47 ` Martin K. Petersen
@ 2010-08-05 20:39 ` Dan Porat
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Dan Porat @ 2010-08-05 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin K. Petersen; +Cc: James Bottomley, linux-ide, linux-scsi
Thank you all for your great advice.
Actually we did succeed with the Hitachi drives.
Thank you very very much.
Dan Porat
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Martin K. Petersen
<martin.petersen@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>> "Dan" == Dan Porat <dan.porat@gmail.com> writes:
>
> Dan> [root@fedora13 ~]# sg_inq /dev/sdb
> [...]
> Dan> [root@fedora13 ~]# sg_readcap /dev/sdb
> [...]
>
> I asked for EXTENDED INQUIRY and READ CAPACITY(16).
>
> # sg_inq -x /dev/sdb
> # sg_readcap -l /dev/sdb
>
> It does not look like you have reformatted the drive, though...
>
> --
> Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-05 20:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <AANLkTilcpFgsYtEUkZ2zAU3SDs0jetiajYPzKUWgFMyD@mail.gmail.com>
2010-07-02 18:06 ` 520 BPS data integrity vendors James Bottomley
2010-07-03 1:03 ` Dan Porat
2010-07-03 7:33 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-07-06 18:01 ` Dan Porat
2010-07-06 18:53 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-07-07 10:34 ` Dan Porat
2010-07-08 15:51 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-07-15 10:08 ` Dan Porat
2010-07-15 13:47 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-08-05 20:39 ` Dan Porat
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox