From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: RFC: Transport identifier Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 10:42:07 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1235663301.19035.44.camel@localhost.localdomain> <49A94FEB.6050400@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from rcsinet12.oracle.com ([148.87.113.124]:30554 "EHLO rgminet12.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752003AbZB1Pm2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Feb 2009 10:42:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <49A94FEB.6050400@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (Stefan Richter's message of "Sat\, 28 Feb 2009 15\:53\:31 +0100") Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Stefan Richter Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" , James Bottomley , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "Stefan" == Stefan Richter writes: Stefan> particular target breaks by READ CAPACITY 16? I have doubts. Stefan> Command set support is independent of transport protocol Stefan> support. I think that's a separate discussion we need to have. My original patch facilitates a check like that but it's not the only use for the transport_id. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering