* [PATCH v6 1/2] Revert "scsi: ufs: disable vccq if it's not needed by UFS device"
2019-02-27 10:39 [PATCH v6 0/2] Clean up UFSHC driver Marc Gonzalez
@ 2019-02-27 10:41 ` Marc Gonzalez
2019-02-27 10:43 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] scsi: ufs: Remove unused device quirks Marc Gonzalez
2019-02-27 13:55 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] Clean up UFSHC driver Martin K. Petersen
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marc Gonzalez @ 2019-02-27 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: SCSI, LKML
Cc: Jeffrey Hugo, Bjorn Andersson, Evan Green, Douglas Anderson,
Alim Akhtar, Avri Altman, Pedro Sousa, Bart Van Assche,
Stanislav Nijnikov, Alex Lemberg, Ohad Sharabi, Hannes Reinecke,
Kyuho Choi, Martin Petersen
This reverts commit 60f0187031c05e04cbadffb62f557d0ff3564490.
There was one conflict in drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
<<<<<<< HEAD
/* Init check for device descriptor sizes */
ufshcd_init_desc_sizes(hba);
ret = ufs_get_device_desc(hba, &card);
if (ret) {
dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: Failed getting device info. err = %d\n",
__func__, ret);
goto out;
}
ufs_fixup_device_setup(hba, &card);
ufshcd_tune_unipro_params(hba);
ret = ufshcd_set_vccq_rail_unused(hba,
(hba->dev_quirks & UFS_DEVICE_NO_VCCQ) ? true : false);
if (ret)
goto out;
=======
ufs_advertise_fixup_device(hba);
>>>>>>> parent of 60f0187031c0... scsi: ufs: disable vccq if it's not needed by UFS device
Resolution: keep HEAD, and delete the ufshcd_set_vccq_rail_unused()
call and corresponding error-handling code.
Clean up loose ends in a follow-up patch.
60f0187031c0 introduced a small power optimization: ignore the vccq load
specified in the UFSHC DT node when said host controller is connected
to specific Flash chips (currently, Samsung and Hynix).
Unfortunately, this optimization breaks UFS on systems where vccq
powers not only the Flash chip, but the host controller as well,
such as APQ8098 MEDIABOX or MTP8998:
[ 3.929877] ufshcd-qcom 1da4000.ufshc: ufshcd_query_attr: opcode 0x04 for idn 13 failed, index 0, err = -11
[ 5.433815] ufshcd-qcom 1da4000.ufshc: ufshcd_query_attr: opcode 0x04 for idn 13 failed, index 0, err = -11
[ 6.937771] ufshcd-qcom 1da4000.ufshc: ufshcd_query_attr: opcode 0x04 for idn 13 failed, index 0, err = -11
[ 6.937866] ufshcd-qcom 1da4000.ufshc: ufshcd_query_attr_retry: query attribute, idn 13, failed with error -11 after 3 retires
[ 6.946412] ufshcd-qcom 1da4000.ufshc: ufshcd_disable_auto_bkops: failed to enable exception event -11
[ 6.957972] ufshcd-qcom 1da4000.ufshc: dme-peer-get: attr-id 0x1587 failed 3 retries
[ 6.967181] ufshcd-qcom 1da4000.ufshc: dme-peer-get: attr-id 0x1586 failed 3 retries
[ 6.975025] ufshcd-qcom 1da4000.ufshc: ufshcd_get_max_pwr_mode: invalid max pwm tx gear read = 0
[ 6.982755] ufshcd-qcom 1da4000.ufshc: ufshcd_probe_hba: Failed getting max supported power mode
[ 8.505770] ufshcd-qcom 1da4000.ufshc: ufshcd_query_flag: Sending flag query for idn 3 failed, err = -11
[ 10.009807] ufshcd-qcom 1da4000.ufshc: ufshcd_query_flag: Sending flag query for idn 3 failed, err = -11
[ 11.513766] ufshcd-qcom 1da4000.ufshc: ufshcd_query_flag: Sending flag query for idn 3 failed, err = -11
[ 11.513861] ufshcd-qcom 1da4000.ufshc: ufshcd_query_flag_retry: query attribute, opcode 5, idn 3, failed with error -11 after 3 retires
[ 13.049807] ufshcd-qcom 1da4000.ufshc: __ufshcd_query_descriptor: opcode 0x01 for idn 8 failed, index 0, err = -11
[ 14.553768] ufshcd-qcom 1da4000.ufshc: __ufshcd_query_descriptor: opcode 0x01 for idn 8 failed, index 0, err = -11
[ 16.057767] ufshcd-qcom 1da4000.ufshc: __ufshcd_query_descriptor: opcode 0x01 for idn 8 failed, index 0, err = -11
[ 16.057872] ufshcd-qcom 1da4000.ufshc: ufshcd_read_desc_param: Failed reading descriptor. desc_id 8, desc_index 0, param_offset 0, ret -11
[ 16.067109] ufshcd-qcom 1da4000.ufshc: ufshcd_init_icc_levels: Failed reading power descriptor.len = 98 ret = -11
[ 37.073787] ufshcd-qcom 1da4000.ufshc: link startup failed 1
In my opinion, the rationale for the original patch is questionable.
If neither the UFSHC, nor the Flash chip, require any load from vccq,
then that power rail should simply not be specified at all in the DT.
Working around that fact in the driver is detrimental, as evidenced
by the failure to initialize the host controller on MSM8998.
Acked-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>
Acked-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@free.fr>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h | 1 -
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 59 +++------------------------------------
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
index 6d176815e6ce..21e4ccb5ba6e 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
@@ -514,7 +514,6 @@ struct ufs_vreg {
struct regulator *reg;
const char *name;
bool enabled;
- bool unused;
int min_uV;
int max_uV;
int min_uA;
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 5ca4581e60d5..a5bfcf04fdba 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -251,7 +251,6 @@ static int ufshcd_probe_hba(struct ufs_hba *hba);
static int __ufshcd_setup_clocks(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool on,
bool skip_ref_clk);
static int ufshcd_setup_clocks(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool on);
-static int ufshcd_set_vccq_rail_unused(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool unused);
static int ufshcd_uic_hibern8_exit(struct ufs_hba *hba);
static int ufshcd_uic_hibern8_enter(struct ufs_hba *hba);
static inline void ufshcd_add_delay_before_dme_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba);
@@ -6830,11 +6829,6 @@ static int ufshcd_probe_hba(struct ufs_hba *hba)
ufs_fixup_device_setup(hba, &card);
ufshcd_tune_unipro_params(hba);
- ret = ufshcd_set_vccq_rail_unused(hba,
- (hba->dev_quirks & UFS_DEVICE_NO_VCCQ) ? true : false);
- if (ret)
- goto out;
-
/* UFS device is also active now */
ufshcd_set_ufs_dev_active(hba);
ufshcd_force_reset_auto_bkops(hba);
@@ -7018,24 +7012,13 @@ static int ufshcd_config_vreg_load(struct device *dev, struct ufs_vreg *vreg,
static inline int ufshcd_config_vreg_lpm(struct ufs_hba *hba,
struct ufs_vreg *vreg)
{
- if (!vreg)
- return 0;
- else if (vreg->unused)
- return 0;
- else
- return ufshcd_config_vreg_load(hba->dev, vreg,
- UFS_VREG_LPM_LOAD_UA);
+ return ufshcd_config_vreg_load(hba->dev, vreg, UFS_VREG_LPM_LOAD_UA);
}
static inline int ufshcd_config_vreg_hpm(struct ufs_hba *hba,
struct ufs_vreg *vreg)
{
- if (!vreg)
- return 0;
- else if (vreg->unused)
- return 0;
- else
- return ufshcd_config_vreg_load(hba->dev, vreg, vreg->max_uA);
+ return ufshcd_config_vreg_load(hba->dev, vreg, vreg->max_uA);
}
static int ufshcd_config_vreg(struct device *dev,
@@ -7073,9 +7056,7 @@ static int ufshcd_enable_vreg(struct device *dev, struct ufs_vreg *vreg)
{
int ret = 0;
- if (!vreg)
- goto out;
- else if (vreg->enabled || vreg->unused)
+ if (!vreg || vreg->enabled)
goto out;
ret = ufshcd_config_vreg(dev, vreg, true);
@@ -7095,9 +7076,7 @@ static int ufshcd_disable_vreg(struct device *dev, struct ufs_vreg *vreg)
{
int ret = 0;
- if (!vreg)
- goto out;
- else if (!vreg->enabled || vreg->unused)
+ if (!vreg || !vreg->enabled)
goto out;
ret = regulator_disable(vreg->reg);
@@ -7203,36 +7182,6 @@ static int ufshcd_init_hba_vreg(struct ufs_hba *hba)
return 0;
}
-static int ufshcd_set_vccq_rail_unused(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool unused)
-{
- int ret = 0;
- struct ufs_vreg_info *info = &hba->vreg_info;
-
- if (!info)
- goto out;
- else if (!info->vccq)
- goto out;
-
- if (unused) {
- /* shut off the rail here */
- ret = ufshcd_toggle_vreg(hba->dev, info->vccq, false);
- /*
- * Mark this rail as no longer used, so it doesn't get enabled
- * later by mistake
- */
- if (!ret)
- info->vccq->unused = true;
- } else {
- /*
- * rail should have been already enabled hence just make sure
- * that unused flag is cleared.
- */
- info->vccq->unused = false;
- }
-out:
- return ret;
-}
-
static int __ufshcd_setup_clocks(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool on,
bool skip_ref_clk)
{
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [PATCH v6 2/2] scsi: ufs: Remove unused device quirks
2019-02-27 10:39 [PATCH v6 0/2] Clean up UFSHC driver Marc Gonzalez
2019-02-27 10:41 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] Revert "scsi: ufs: disable vccq if it's not needed by UFS device" Marc Gonzalez
@ 2019-02-27 10:43 ` Marc Gonzalez
2019-02-27 13:55 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] Clean up UFSHC driver Martin K. Petersen
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marc Gonzalez @ 2019-02-27 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: SCSI, LKML
Cc: Jeffrey Hugo, Bjorn Andersson, Evan Green, Douglas Anderson,
Alim Akhtar, Avri Altman, Pedro Sousa, Bart Van Assche,
Stanislav Nijnikov, Alex Lemberg, Ohad Sharabi, Hannes Reinecke,
Kyuho Choi, Martin Petersen
The UFSHC driver defines a few quirks that are not used anywhere:
UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_BROKEN_LCC
UFS_DEVICE_NO_VCCQ
UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_NO_LINK_OFF
UFS_DEVICE_NO_FASTAUTO
Let's remove them.
Acked-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>
Acked-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@free.fr>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs_quirks.h | 29 -----------------------------
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 4 ----
2 files changed, 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs_quirks.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs_quirks.h
index 5d2dfdb41a6f..a9bbd34d6b16 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs_quirks.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs_quirks.h
@@ -44,21 +44,6 @@ struct ufs_dev_fix {
.quirk = (_quirk), \
}
-/*
- * If UFS device is having issue in processing LCC (Line Control
- * Command) coming from UFS host controller then enable this quirk.
- * When this quirk is enabled, host controller driver should disable
- * the LCC transmission on UFS host controller (by clearing
- * TX_LCC_ENABLE attribute of host to 0).
- */
-#define UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_BROKEN_LCC (1 << 0)
-
-/*
- * Some UFS devices don't need VCCQ rail for device operations. Enabling this
- * quirk for such devices will make sure that VCCQ rail is not voted.
- */
-#define UFS_DEVICE_NO_VCCQ (1 << 1)
-
/*
* Some vendor's UFS device sends back to back NACs for the DL data frames
* causing the host controller to raise the DFES error status. Sometimes
@@ -84,13 +69,6 @@ struct ufs_dev_fix {
*/
#define UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_RECOVERY_FROM_DL_NAC_ERRORS (1 << 2)
-/*
- * Some UFS devices may not work properly after resume if the link was kept
- * in off state during suspend. Enabling this quirk will not allow the
- * link to be kept in off state during suspend.
- */
-#define UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_NO_LINK_OFF (1 << 3)
-
/*
* Few Toshiba UFS device models advertise RX_MIN_ACTIVATETIME_CAPABILITY as
* 600us which may not be enough for reliable hibern8 exit hardware sequence
@@ -100,13 +78,6 @@ struct ufs_dev_fix {
*/
#define UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_PA_TACTIVATE (1 << 4)
-/*
- * Some UFS memory devices may have really low read/write throughput in
- * FAST AUTO mode, enable this quirk to make sure that FAST AUTO mode is
- * never enabled for such devices.
- */
-#define UFS_DEVICE_NO_FASTAUTO (1 << 5)
-
/*
* It seems some UFS devices may keep drawing more than sleep current
* (atleast for 500us) from UFS rails (especially from VCCQ rail).
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index a5bfcf04fdba..54ed1f8db1bf 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -219,11 +219,8 @@ static struct ufs_dev_fix ufs_fixups[] = {
/* UFS cards deviations table */
UFS_FIX(UFS_VENDOR_SAMSUNG, UFS_ANY_MODEL,
UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_DELAY_BEFORE_LPM),
- UFS_FIX(UFS_VENDOR_SAMSUNG, UFS_ANY_MODEL, UFS_DEVICE_NO_VCCQ),
UFS_FIX(UFS_VENDOR_SAMSUNG, UFS_ANY_MODEL,
UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_RECOVERY_FROM_DL_NAC_ERRORS),
- UFS_FIX(UFS_VENDOR_SAMSUNG, UFS_ANY_MODEL,
- UFS_DEVICE_NO_FASTAUTO),
UFS_FIX(UFS_VENDOR_SAMSUNG, UFS_ANY_MODEL,
UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_HOST_PA_TACTIVATE),
UFS_FIX(UFS_VENDOR_TOSHIBA, UFS_ANY_MODEL,
@@ -232,7 +229,6 @@ static struct ufs_dev_fix ufs_fixups[] = {
UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_PA_TACTIVATE),
UFS_FIX(UFS_VENDOR_TOSHIBA, "THGLF2G9D8KBADG",
UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_PA_TACTIVATE),
- UFS_FIX(UFS_VENDOR_SKHYNIX, UFS_ANY_MODEL, UFS_DEVICE_NO_VCCQ),
UFS_FIX(UFS_VENDOR_SKHYNIX, UFS_ANY_MODEL,
UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_HOST_PA_SAVECONFIGTIME),
UFS_FIX(UFS_VENDOR_SKHYNIX, "hB8aL1" /*H28U62301AMR*/,
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread