From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] bsg: split handling of SCSI CDBs vs transport requeues Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 03:17:29 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20171003104845.10417-1-hch@lst.de> <20171003104845.10417-10-hch@lst.de> <20171019155933.GE26185@bblock-ThinkPad-W530> <20171020162630.GA14277@lst.de> <20171020164727.GA26380@bblock-ThinkPad-W530> <20171023062949.GA16978@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:46012 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751298AbdJWHRj (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Oct 2017 03:17:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20171023062949.GA16978@lst.de> (Christoph Hellwig's message of "Mon, 23 Oct 2017 08:29:49 +0200") Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" , Benjamin Block , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Thumshirn , Jens Axboe Christoph, >> Yes, I expected the bsg bits to go through Jens' tree. > > Ok, then I misremembered it, and we'll have to delay the remaining > patches until the next merge window, as they depend on the previous > ones. I don't mind taking them through SCSI if Jens agrees. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering