* Re: 520 BPS data integrity vendors [not found] <AANLkTilcpFgsYtEUkZ2zAU3SDs0jetiajYPzKUWgFMyD@mail.gmail.com> @ 2010-07-02 18:06 ` James Bottomley 2010-07-03 1:03 ` Dan Porat 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: James Bottomley @ 2010-07-02 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dan Porat; +Cc: linux-ide, linux-scsi On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 17:11 -0400, Dan Porat wrote: > Hi , > > In the documentation of 2.6.34 it says "We have been working with > several FC/SAS HBA vendors to enable the protection information to be > transferred to and from their controllers" > I would like to test SAS 520. So I'm having a little difficulty parsing this: SAS 520 is actually a financial audit standard (which I really wish I didn't know about) ... I assume you're actually talking about DIF/DIX? The integrity standard for SCSI? > Which Vendor and what specific SAS HBA model will support it ? > Thanks I've added linux-scsi, since this is a SCSI question not an IDE one. The only SAS HBA supporting DIF I know of with a working Linux driver is the mpt2sas. It supports DIF types 1 and 3. James ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 520 BPS data integrity vendors 2010-07-02 18:06 ` 520 BPS data integrity vendors James Bottomley @ 2010-07-03 1:03 ` Dan Porat 2010-07-03 7:33 ` Martin K. Petersen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Dan Porat @ 2010-07-03 1:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: James Bottomley; +Cc: linux-ide, linux-scsi On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 2:06 PM, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de> wrote: > On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 17:11 -0400, Dan Porat wrote: >> Hi , >> >> In the documentation of 2.6.34 it says "We have been working with >> several FC/SAS HBA vendors to enable the protection information to be >> transferred to and from their controllers" >> I would like to test SAS 520. > > So I'm having a little difficulty parsing this: SAS 520 is actually a > financial audit standard (which I really wish I didn't know about) ... I > assume you're actually talking about DIF/DIX? The integrity standard > for SCSI? > >>>You are right on the money. >>>I mean DIF/DIX . >>>The final purpose it to run a SATA 520 through a DIF supporting HBA , and a SAS/SATA dongle (interposer card). >>>As initial stage we would like to check SAS DIF field. >>>Afterwards just put it through a dongle to a SATA 520 sector size drive. >> Which Vendor and what specific SAS HBA model will support it ? >> Thanks > > I've added linux-scsi, since this is a SCSI question not an IDE one. > > The only SAS HBA supporting DIF I know of with a working Linux driver is > the mpt2sas. It supports DIF types 1 and 3. > >>Would you know of any specific LSI SAS/HBAmodel which will support SCSI DIF/DIX ? > James > > > Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 520 BPS data integrity vendors 2010-07-03 1:03 ` Dan Porat @ 2010-07-03 7:33 ` Martin K. Petersen 2010-07-06 18:01 ` Dan Porat 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Martin K. Petersen @ 2010-07-03 7:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dan Porat; +Cc: James Bottomley, linux-ide, linux-scsi >>>>> "Dan" == Dan Porat <dan.porat@gmail.com> writes: >>> Would you know of any specific LSI SAS/HBAmodel which will support >>> SCSI DIF/DIX ? LSI's 92xx series HBAs have the LSISAS2008 chip that's required for DIF operation. These boards do not support DIX. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 520 BPS data integrity vendors 2010-07-03 7:33 ` Martin K. Petersen @ 2010-07-06 18:01 ` Dan Porat 2010-07-06 18:53 ` Martin K. Petersen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Dan Porat @ 2010-07-06 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Martin K. Petersen; +Cc: James Bottomley, linux-ide, linux-scsi We checked with kernel 2.6.34 , Seagate Cheetah 15K and the following HBA: LSI 9212-4i4e Still , no success. Any Ideas? Thanks On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 3:33 AM, Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> wrote: > > >>>>> "Dan" == Dan Porat <dan.porat@gmail.com> writes: > > >>> Would you know of any specific LSI SAS/HBAmodel which will support > >>> SCSI DIF/DIX ? > > LSI's 92xx series HBAs have the LSISAS2008 chip that's required for DIF > operation. These boards do not support DIX. > > -- > Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 520 BPS data integrity vendors 2010-07-06 18:01 ` Dan Porat @ 2010-07-06 18:53 ` Martin K. Petersen 2010-07-07 10:34 ` Dan Porat 2010-07-15 10:08 ` Dan Porat 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Martin K. Petersen @ 2010-07-06 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dan Porat; +Cc: Martin K. Petersen, James Bottomley, linux-ide, linux-scsi >>>>> "Dan" == Dan Porat <dan.porat@gmail.com> writes: Dan> We checked with kernel 2.6.34 , Seagate Cheetah 15K and the Dan> following HBA: LSI 9212-4i4e Dan> Still , no success. Send us the output of: # lsscsi -p # sg_inq -x /dev/sdN # sg_readcap -l /dev/sdN Dan> Any Ideas? And you are sure that the drive is formatted with DIF? Seagate's standard firmware doesn't support it, fwiw. It's a build-to-order option. Hitachi drives support DIF out of the box. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 520 BPS data integrity vendors 2010-07-06 18:53 ` Martin K. Petersen @ 2010-07-07 10:34 ` Dan Porat 2010-07-08 15:51 ` Martin K. Petersen 2010-07-15 10:08 ` Dan Porat 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Dan Porat @ 2010-07-07 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Martin K. Petersen; +Cc: James Bottomley, linux-ide, linux-scsi Hi, Thanks for the elaborate answer. We want to buy the drive which supports (rather than currently investigating , probably your assumption is right and our seagate does not have the required FW). Regarding the specific model , Will any of those do ? HUS151414VL3800 HUS151473VL3800 HUS151436VL3800 HUS151414VL3600 HUS151473VL3600 HUS151436VL3600 Thanks Dan Porat On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> wrote: > > >>>>> "Dan" == Dan Porat <dan.porat@gmail.com> writes: > > Dan> We checked with kernel 2.6.34 , Seagate Cheetah 15K and the > Dan> following HBA: LSI 9212-4i4e > > Dan> Still , no success. > > Send us the output of: > > # lsscsi -p > # sg_inq -x /dev/sdN > # sg_readcap -l /dev/sdN > > > Dan> Any Ideas? > > And you are sure that the drive is formatted with DIF? Seagate's > standard firmware doesn't support it, fwiw. It's a build-to-order > option. > > Hitachi drives support DIF out of the box. > > -- > Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 520 BPS data integrity vendors 2010-07-07 10:34 ` Dan Porat @ 2010-07-08 15:51 ` Martin K. Petersen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Martin K. Petersen @ 2010-07-08 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dan Porat; +Cc: Martin K. Petersen, James Bottomley, linux-ide, linux-scsi >>>>> "Dan" == Dan Porat <dan.porat@gmail.com> writes: Dan> Regarding the specific model , Will any of those do ? Dan> HUS151414VL3800 HUS151473VL3800 HUS151436VL3800 HUS151414VL3600 Dan> HUS151473VL3600 HUS151436VL3600 I'm not familiar with those specific models. But as far as I know any SAS/FC drive shipped by Hitachi within the last 3 years is DIF-capable. Check the datasheet for "end-2-end protection". -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 520 BPS data integrity vendors 2010-07-06 18:53 ` Martin K. Petersen 2010-07-07 10:34 ` Dan Porat @ 2010-07-15 10:08 ` Dan Porat 2010-07-15 13:47 ` Martin K. Petersen 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Dan Porat @ 2010-07-15 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Martin K. Petersen; +Cc: James Bottomley, linux-ide, linux-scsi Following is the output with the Hitachi drive: [root@fedora13 ~]# lsscsi -p [0:0:0:0] cd/dvd hp CDDVDW TS-H653R 0E00 /dev/sr0 [1:0:0:0] disk ATA ST31000528AS CC38 /dev/sda [6:0:0:0] disk HITACHI HUS151473VLS300 A420 /dev/sdb [root@fedora13 ~]# sg_inq /dev/sdb standard INQUIRY: PQual=0 Device_type=0 RMB=0 version=0x05 [SPC-3] [AERC=0] [TrmTsk=0] NormACA=0 HiSUP=0 Resp_data_format=2 SCCS=0 ACC=0 TPGS=0 3PC=0 Protect=0 BQue=0 EncServ=0 MultiP=1 (VS=0) [MChngr=0] [ACKREQQ=0] Addr16=0 [RelAdr=0] WBus16=0 Sync=0 Linked=0 [TranDis=0] CmdQue=1 [SPI: Clocking=0x0 QAS=0 IUS=0] length=164 (0xa4) Peripheral device type: disk Vendor identification: HITACHI Product identification: HUS151473VLS300 Product revision level: A420 [root@fedora13 ~]# sg_readcap /dev/sdb Read Capacity results: Last logical block address=140174231 (0x85ae397), Number of blocks=140174232 Logical block length=520 bytes Hence: Device size: 72890600640 bytes, 69513.9 MiB, 72.89 GB [root@fedora13 ~]# Thanks On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> wrote: > > >>>>> "Dan" == Dan Porat <dan.porat@gmail.com> writes: > > Dan> We checked with kernel 2.6.34 , Seagate Cheetah 15K and the > Dan> following HBA: LSI 9212-4i4e > > Dan> Still , no success. > > Send us the output of: > > # lsscsi -p > # sg_inq -x /dev/sdN > # sg_readcap -l /dev/sdN > > > Dan> Any Ideas? > > And you are sure that the drive is formatted with DIF? Seagate's > standard firmware doesn't support it, fwiw. It's a build-to-order > option. > > Hitachi drives support DIF out of the box. > > -- > Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 520 BPS data integrity vendors 2010-07-15 10:08 ` Dan Porat @ 2010-07-15 13:47 ` Martin K. Petersen 2010-08-05 20:39 ` Dan Porat 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Martin K. Petersen @ 2010-07-15 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dan Porat; +Cc: Martin K. Petersen, James Bottomley, linux-ide, linux-scsi >>>>> "Dan" == Dan Porat <dan.porat@gmail.com> writes: Dan> [root@fedora13 ~]# sg_inq /dev/sdb [...] Dan> [root@fedora13 ~]# sg_readcap /dev/sdb [...] I asked for EXTENDED INQUIRY and READ CAPACITY(16). # sg_inq -x /dev/sdb # sg_readcap -l /dev/sdb It does not look like you have reformatted the drive, though... -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 520 BPS data integrity vendors 2010-07-15 13:47 ` Martin K. Petersen @ 2010-08-05 20:39 ` Dan Porat 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Dan Porat @ 2010-08-05 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Martin K. Petersen; +Cc: James Bottomley, linux-ide, linux-scsi Thank you all for your great advice. Actually we did succeed with the Hitachi drives. Thank you very very much. Dan Porat On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> wrote: > > >>>>> "Dan" == Dan Porat <dan.porat@gmail.com> writes: > > Dan> [root@fedora13 ~]# sg_inq /dev/sdb > [...] > Dan> [root@fedora13 ~]# sg_readcap /dev/sdb > [...] > > I asked for EXTENDED INQUIRY and READ CAPACITY(16). > > # sg_inq -x /dev/sdb > # sg_readcap -l /dev/sdb > > It does not look like you have reformatted the drive, though... > > -- > Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-05 20:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <AANLkTilcpFgsYtEUkZ2zAU3SDs0jetiajYPzKUWgFMyD@mail.gmail.com>
2010-07-02 18:06 ` 520 BPS data integrity vendors James Bottomley
2010-07-03 1:03 ` Dan Porat
2010-07-03 7:33 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-07-06 18:01 ` Dan Porat
2010-07-06 18:53 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-07-07 10:34 ` Dan Porat
2010-07-08 15:51 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-07-15 10:08 ` Dan Porat
2010-07-15 13:47 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-08-05 20:39 ` Dan Porat
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox