From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: devinfo: BLIST_TRY_VPD_PAGES for SanDisk Cruzer Blade Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 16:31:32 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20190618013146.21961-1-marcos.souza.org@gmail.com> <20190618013146.21961-2-marcos.souza.org@gmail.com> <20190619094540.GA26980@continental> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190619094540.GA26980@continental> (Marcos Paulo de Souza's message of "Wed, 19 Jun 2019 06:45:43 -0300") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Marcos Paulo de Souza Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "James E.J. Bottomley" List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Marcos, >> What's your confidence level wrt. all Cruzer Blades handling this >> correctly? How many devices have you tested this change with? > > I've tested three Cruzer Blades that I have at hand, and all of them > have VPD support, and also checked with a friend of mine that also > have one. I can't say about "all others" but so far, 4/4 devices that > I tested have VPD. (They were all SPC-3 or SPC-4 compliant). That's not a very large sample. However, SanDisk have traditionally been pretty good wrt. spec compliance. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering