From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] MAINTAINERS: update OSD entries
Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 21:43:02 -0400
Message-ID: <yq18tm6u7o9.fsf@oracle.com>
References: <20170502075720.23570-1-hch@lst.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170502075720.23570-1-hch@lst.de> (Christoph Hellwig's message
        of "Tue, 2 May 2017 09:57:20 +0200")
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: ooo@electrozaur.com, bhalevy@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org


Christoph,

> The open-osd domain doesn't exist anymore, and mails to the list lead
> to really annoying bounced that repeat every day.
>
> Also the primarydata address for Benny bounces, and while I have a new
> one for him he doesn't seem to be maintaining the OSD code any more.
>
> Which beggs the question: should we really leave the Supported status
> in MAINTAINERS given that the code is barely maintained?

Applied to 4.12/scsi-fixes.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering