From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: T10-PI: Getting failed tag info Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 19:30:41 -0500 Message-ID: References: <54892468.5060300@vlnb.net> <1418426120.10743.73.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:45897 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750986AbaLPAar (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2014 19:30:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1418426120.10743.73.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com> (Nicholas A. Bellinger's message of "Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:15:20 -0800") Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" , Vladislav Bolkhovitin , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "Nic" == Nicholas A Bellinger writes: Nic> Also, AFAICT this patch still doesn't set the failed LBA, right..? Nic> Any thoughts about the most sane way to get the failed LBA Nic> information back to a caller like IBLOCK performing submission with Nic> bio + bip..? That's correct. My original patch did this. More on that in my response to hch... -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering