From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] scsi: be2iscsi: Use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 16:58:36 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20170112142132.14552-1-weiyj.lk@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:29956 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751363AbdATV6t (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2017 16:58:49 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20170112142132.14552-1-weiyj.lk@gmail.com> (Wei Yongjun's message of "Thu, 12 Jan 2017 14:21:32 +0000") Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Wei Yongjun Cc: Subbu Seetharaman , Ketan Mukadam , Jitendra Bhivare , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , Wei Yongjun , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "Wei" == Wei Yongjun writes: Wei> From: Wei Yongjun A spin lock is taken Wei> here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC. Applied to 4.11/scsi-queue. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering