From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Introduce a type for device information flags, namely bflags_t Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 19:00:24 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20171115023317.3595-1-bart.vanassche@wdc.com> <20171115023317.3595-4-bart.vanassche@wdc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:20473 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932182AbdKPABp (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2017 19:01:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20171115023317.3595-4-bart.vanassche@wdc.com> (Bart Van Assche's message of "Tue, 14 Nov 2017 18:33:17 -0800") Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Bart Van Assche Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" , "James E . J . Bottomley" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Hannes Reinecke , Johannes Thumshirn Bart, > +typedef __u32 __bitwise bflags_t; Since we're already out of flags, let's not perpetuate the u32 limitation. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering