From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI: don't get target/host busy_count in scsi_mq_get_budget() Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 22:53:12 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20171104015534.32684-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <1509991480.2409.54.camel@wdc.com> <20171107021929.GC15090@ming.t460p> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171107021929.GC15090@ming.t460p> (Ming Lei's message of "Tue, 7 Nov 2017 10:19:30 +0800") Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ming Lei Cc: Bart Van Assche , "hch@infradead.org" , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "axboe@fb.com" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "osandov@fb.com" , "john.garry@huawei.com" , "loberman@redhat.com" List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Ming, >> Since this is a SCSI patch the SCSI maintainer, Martin Petersen, >> should have been Cc-ed for this patch. Additionally, I think that >> this patch should not have been queued by Jens before Martin had >> approved this patch. > > This patch has been CCed to SCSI list. I don't need a personal CC, linux-scsi is sufficient. However, as a general rule, changes to any file in drivers/scsi needs go through the SCSI tree. We sometimes make exceptions to facilitate the merge process. In those cases an Acked-by: will be provided to indicate that it is OK that the patch goes through a different tree. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering