From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: UFS patchset Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:19:52 -0400 Message-ID: References: <57233664.3090101@synopsys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:36305 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753077AbcD2MUF (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:20:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <57233664.3090101@synopsys.com> (Joao Pinto's message of "Fri, 29 Apr 2016 11:24:36 +0100") Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Joao Pinto Cc: martin.petersen@oracle.com, "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" >>>>> "Joao" == Joao Pinto writes: Joao, Joao> Could you please give me feedback about the UFS patch-set? The Joao> patches have been acked by various developers, so maybe could it Joao> be possible to put it into the 4.7 queue? It is on my list. I think we are OK from a SCSI perspective but I believe there were still a couple of concerns in the ARM/device tree department. So I would like some confirmation from those developers that the code is now acceptable. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering