From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Tom Yan <tom.ty89@gmail.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: configurable discard parameters
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 13:03:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq1mvzq4at7.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGnHSEm89yFPPTVUtbk1s84wanKK6RTY5hdZCMdbw+a+vwecDA@mail.gmail.com> (Tom Yan's message of "Wed, 24 Jun 2015 00:41:20 +0800")
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Yan <tom.ty89@gmail.com> writes:
Tom> Currently what the kernel does is assume all devices support 1
Tom> sector granularity.
The ATA Command Set does not allow for any other granularity than 1
sector.
Bigger granularity reporting is supported in SCSI SBC to allow for
thinly provisioned disk arrays with a bigger allocation unit. It is
common for disk arrays to provision LUN space in units of 1MB or more.
Tom> For my Intel SSD, which actually has a lower limit of 8 sectors, it
Tom> shows: Data Set Management TRIM supported (limit 1 block) while for
Tom> the SanDisk Extreme USB, which actually has a lower limit of 256
Tom> sectors, it shows: Data Set Management TRIM supported (limit 8
Tom> blocks)
It don't know what these "lower limits" you are talking about are.
What hdparm tells you is that DSM TRIM on the Intel drive supports 1
block (512 bytes) of range payload data. Whereas the SanDisk drive
supports a full 4KB page of range payload data (8 * 512 bytes).
We did try to enable payloads bigger than 512 bytes back in the day but
most drives that reported supporting the bigger payload actually didn't
and all hell broke loose. So we reverted to a single sector payload for
libata.
I still have the payload patch in my SSD test branch and regularly test
with it. But there are still drives that fail in mysterious ways with it
in place and so far I haven't felt compelled to maintain yet another
blacklist.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-23 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-20 17:12 configurable discard parameters Tom Yan
2015-06-21 0:20 ` Martin K. Petersen
2015-06-21 7:03 ` Tom Yan
2015-06-21 8:05 ` Tom Yan
2015-06-21 12:36 ` Tom Yan
2015-06-21 20:30 ` Tom Yan
2015-06-22 20:57 ` Martin K. Petersen
2015-06-23 14:16 ` Tom Yan
2015-06-23 15:36 ` Martin K. Petersen
2015-06-23 16:41 ` Tom Yan
2015-06-23 17:03 ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
2015-06-23 17:24 ` Tom Yan
2015-06-23 18:26 ` Martin K. Petersen
2015-06-23 21:25 ` Tom Yan
2015-06-24 2:55 ` Martin K. Petersen
2015-06-24 12:46 ` Tom Yan
2015-06-25 1:15 ` Martin K. Petersen
2015-06-26 7:05 ` Tom Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq1mvzq4at7.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net \
--to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom.ty89@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox