From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B44C8C4332B for ; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 15:45:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8677720722 for ; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 15:45:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="uEAAeNc0" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726836AbgCVPpW (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Mar 2020 11:45:22 -0400 Received: from aserp2120.oracle.com ([141.146.126.78]:37150 "EHLO aserp2120.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726752AbgCVPpW (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Mar 2020 11:45:22 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 02MFjKvC067568; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 15:45:20 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=to : cc : subject : from : references : date : in-reply-to : message-id : mime-version : content-type; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=8KKUJ2cNS/x6N1XA/z5fJYallr9xfcAOB9iWPmsTKhc=; b=uEAAeNc0S+Qm8taF/i/dsvNWQNqIR+TjaTyRydPPy6Xqn9/wtcKq3S3186ZWojse65Fu u+zY9mBJTOmd+UJKojT6rQSbZLyCb99qfBkft4zbVY3Z90ZBbqLd3fUD9ee14/jbcwgp BSZIQpf2d+UKFJ/mA5WL8eiwMTjpg+UHqClb9mkjyltEwVEHODzW9FB5+6wgLdP6mAUr H0cqR7vMwaa0wdRA+KKp6YlpvqY/cY+tPDWxAFOdp9qB+U6DlLzoM3cSPFUH+/yqDEAF /2VaRvosiMrY/4MKhCYu96YmaYF4FzLyYaE4MkY+5hz3iXyfXvHXY1u2unisMs7up79V GQ== Received: from userp3030.oracle.com (userp3030.oracle.com [156.151.31.80]) by aserp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2ywavku8f4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 22 Mar 2020 15:45:20 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (userp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 02MFgupI054167; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 15:45:19 GMT Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236]) by userp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2ywvdacnj4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 22 Mar 2020 15:45:19 +0000 Received: from abhmp0006.oracle.com (abhmp0006.oracle.com [141.146.116.12]) by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 02MFjIOP018184; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 15:45:18 GMT Received: from ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com (/10.159.214.123) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 08:45:18 -0700 To: Bernhard Sulzer Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Invalid optimal transfer size 33553920 accepted when physical_block_size 512 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Organization: Oracle Corporation References: <33fb522e-4f61-1b76-914f-c9e6a3553c9b@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 11:45:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <33fb522e-4f61-1b76-914f-c9e6a3553c9b@gmail.com> (Bernhard Sulzer's message of "Sun, 22 Mar 2020 15:32:38 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9568 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=976 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2003220095 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9568 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1011 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2003220095 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Bernhard, > This is pretty curious in itself, because lsblk reports 4096 physical > sector size / 512 logical sector size and I would have thought > physical sector size and physical block size should be the same. Is > this a bug that should be reported? That's peculiar. What does: # dmesg | grep Optimal have to say? Also, please send the output of: # sg_readcap -l /dev/sdc # sg_vpd -p bl /dev/sdc Thanks! -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering