From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] scsi: add Synology DSM 6.0 and higher to 1024 sector blacklist Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 22:20:05 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20160114003437.354D28EE1D4@bedivere.hansenpartnership.com> <570B63B8.6080104@tcnnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:19875 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753561AbcDLCUS (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Apr 2016 22:20:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <570B63B8.6080104@tcnnet.com> (Michel Meyers's message of "Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:43:36 +0200") Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Michel Meyers Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Mike Christie >>>>> "Michel" == Michel Meyers writes: Michel> SYNOLOGY iSCSI devices do not work with large I/O and SYNOLOGY Michel> changed the identifier of the devices Shouldn't we just quirk SYNOLOGY, then? -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering