From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: storvsc: fix SRB_STATUS_ABORTED handling Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 20:59:30 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1457348384-11869-1-git-send-email-vkuznets@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1457348384-11869-1-git-send-email-vkuznets@redhat.com> (Vitaly Kuznetsov's message of "Mon, 7 Mar 2016 11:59:44 +0100") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: driverdev-devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org Sender: "devel" To: Vitaly Kuznetsov Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Haiyang Zhang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@linuxdriverproject.org, Cathy Avery List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "Vitaly" == Vitaly Kuznetsov writes: Vitaly> Commit 3209f9d780d1 ("scsi: storvsc: Fix a bug in the handling Vitaly> of SRB status flags") filtered SRB_STATUS_AUTOSENSE_VALID out Vitaly> effectively making the (SRB_STATUS_ABORTED | Vitaly> SRB_STATUS_AUTOSENSE_VALID) case a dead code. The logic from Vitaly> this branch (e.g. storvsc_device_scan() call) is still required, Vitaly> fix the check. Applied to 4.5/scsi-fixes. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering