public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@gmail.com>,
	"fengli@smartx.com" <fengli@smartx.com>, hch <hch@lst.de>,
	"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] critical target error, bisected
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 20:51:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq1plq8otwh.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <whnt3t5fqae5pujt6fkg5xu6mqxc2x5llbmq6q2lclfuuafbqx@tzj3dzgb7ury> (Shinichiro Kawasaki's message of "Fri, 16 Aug 2024 07:59:52 +0000")


Shinichiro,

> I guess SD_LBP_FULL would be more appropriate than SD_LBP_DISABLE,
> because the comment in drivers/scsi/sd.h says that SD_LBP_DISABLE
> indicates that "Discard disabled due to failed cmd".

> I confirmed that the fix patch avoids my failure both with
> SD_LBP_DISABLE and SD_LBP_FULL.

Yes, you are right. It is more appropriate to print "full" in sysfs when
LBMPE is disabled. Printing aside, the two modes are identical. I
switched the return to SDP_LBP_FULL.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-08-17  0:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-12 14:49 [REGRESSION] critical target error, bisected Chris Bainbridge
2024-08-13  2:09 ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-08-13  2:21   ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-08-16  3:56 ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-08-16  6:08   ` Chris Bainbridge
2024-08-16  7:59   ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2024-08-16  8:06     ` hch
2024-08-17  0:51     ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
2024-08-16  8:21   ` John Garry
2024-08-17  0:53   ` [PATCH] scsi: sd: Do not attempt to configure discard unless LBPME is set Martin K. Petersen
2024-08-17  1:28     ` Martin K. Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=yq1plq8otwh.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com \
    --to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=chris.bainbridge@gmail.com \
    --cc=fengli@smartx.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox