linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/2] scsi: lpfc: spin_lock_irq() is not nestable
@ 2017-06-30  8:02 Dan Carpenter
  2017-06-30  8:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: lpfc: don't double count abort errors Dan Carpenter
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2017-06-30  8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Smart
  Cc: Dick Kennedy, James E.J. Bottomley, Martin K. Petersen,
	linux-scsi, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors

We're calling spin_lock_irq() multiple times, the problem is that on the
first spin_unlock_irq() then we will re-enable IRQs and we don't want
that.

Fixes: 966bb5b71196 ("scsi: lpfc: Break up IO ctx list into a separate get and put list")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c
index 7dc061a14f95..afc523209845 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c
@@ -866,44 +866,44 @@ lpfc_nvmet_cleanup_io_context(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_get_lock, flags);
-	spin_lock_irq(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_put_lock);
+	spin_lock(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_put_lock);
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(ctx_buf, next_ctx_buf,
 			&phba->sli4_hba.lpfc_nvmet_ctx_get_list, list) {
-		spin_lock_irq(&phba->sli4_hba.abts_nvme_buf_list_lock);
+		spin_lock(&phba->sli4_hba.abts_nvme_buf_list_lock);
 		list_del_init(&ctx_buf->list);
-		spin_unlock_irq(&phba->sli4_hba.abts_nvme_buf_list_lock);
+		spin_unlock(&phba->sli4_hba.abts_nvme_buf_list_lock);
 		__lpfc_clear_active_sglq(phba,
 					 ctx_buf->sglq->sli4_lxritag);
 		ctx_buf->sglq->state = SGL_FREED;
 		ctx_buf->sglq->ndlp = NULL;
 
-		spin_lock_irq(&phba->sli4_hba.sgl_list_lock);
+		spin_lock(&phba->sli4_hba.sgl_list_lock);
 		list_add_tail(&ctx_buf->sglq->list,
 			      &phba->sli4_hba.lpfc_nvmet_sgl_list);
-		spin_unlock_irq(&phba->sli4_hba.sgl_list_lock);
+		spin_unlock(&phba->sli4_hba.sgl_list_lock);
 
 		lpfc_sli_release_iocbq(phba, ctx_buf->iocbq);
 		kfree(ctx_buf->context);
 	}
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(ctx_buf, next_ctx_buf,
 			&phba->sli4_hba.lpfc_nvmet_ctx_put_list, list) {
-		spin_lock_irq(&phba->sli4_hba.abts_nvme_buf_list_lock);
+		spin_lock(&phba->sli4_hba.abts_nvme_buf_list_lock);
 		list_del_init(&ctx_buf->list);
-		spin_unlock_irq(&phba->sli4_hba.abts_nvme_buf_list_lock);
+		spin_unlock(&phba->sli4_hba.abts_nvme_buf_list_lock);
 		__lpfc_clear_active_sglq(phba,
 					 ctx_buf->sglq->sli4_lxritag);
 		ctx_buf->sglq->state = SGL_FREED;
 		ctx_buf->sglq->ndlp = NULL;
 
-		spin_lock_irq(&phba->sli4_hba.sgl_list_lock);
+		spin_lock(&phba->sli4_hba.sgl_list_lock);
 		list_add_tail(&ctx_buf->sglq->list,
 			      &phba->sli4_hba.lpfc_nvmet_sgl_list);
-		spin_unlock_irq(&phba->sli4_hba.sgl_list_lock);
+		spin_unlock(&phba->sli4_hba.sgl_list_lock);
 
 		lpfc_sli_release_iocbq(phba, ctx_buf->iocbq);
 		kfree(ctx_buf->context);
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irq(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_put_lock);
+	spin_unlock(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_put_lock);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_get_lock, flags);
 }
 

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2] scsi: lpfc: don't double count abort errors
  2017-06-30  8:02 [PATCH 1/2] scsi: lpfc: spin_lock_irq() is not nestable Dan Carpenter
@ 2017-06-30  8:03 ` Dan Carpenter
  2017-06-30 14:56   ` James Smart
  2017-07-01 21:09   ` Martin K. Petersen
  2017-06-30 14:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] scsi: lpfc: spin_lock_irq() is not nestable James Smart
  2017-07-01 21:09 ` Martin K. Petersen
  2 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2017-06-30  8:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Smart
  Cc: Dick Kennedy, James E.J. Bottomley, Martin K. Petersen,
	linux-scsi, kernel-janitors

If lpfc_nvmet_unsol_fcp_issue_abort() fails then we accidentally
increment "tgtp->xmt_abort_rsp_error" and then two lines later we
increment it a second time.

Fixes: 547077a44b3b ("scsi: lpfc: Adding additional stats counters for nvme.")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c
index 7dc061a14f95..fbeec344c6cc 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c
@@ -2583,7 +2583,6 @@ lpfc_nvmet_unsol_fcp_issue_abort(struct lpfc_hba *phba,
 	}
 
 aerr:
-	atomic_inc(&tgtp->xmt_abort_rsp_error);
 	ctxp->flag &= ~LPFC_NVMET_ABORT_OP;
 	atomic_inc(&tgtp->xmt_abort_rsp_error);
 	lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_ERR, LOG_NVME_ABTS,

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: lpfc: spin_lock_irq() is not nestable
  2017-06-30  8:02 [PATCH 1/2] scsi: lpfc: spin_lock_irq() is not nestable Dan Carpenter
  2017-06-30  8:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: lpfc: don't double count abort errors Dan Carpenter
@ 2017-06-30 14:56 ` James Smart
  2017-07-01 21:09 ` Martin K. Petersen
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: James Smart @ 2017-06-30 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter
  Cc: Dick Kennedy, James E.J. Bottomley, Martin K. Petersen,
	linux-scsi, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors

On 6/30/2017 1:02 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> We're calling spin_lock_irq() multiple times, the problem is that on the
> first spin_unlock_irq() then we will re-enable IRQs and we don't want
> that.
>
> Fixes: 966bb5b71196 ("scsi: lpfc: Break up IO ctx list into a separate get and put list")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>

looks good.

Signed-off-By: James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: lpfc: don't double count abort errors
  2017-06-30  8:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: lpfc: don't double count abort errors Dan Carpenter
@ 2017-06-30 14:56   ` James Smart
  2017-07-01 21:09   ` Martin K. Petersen
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: James Smart @ 2017-06-30 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter
  Cc: Dick Kennedy, James E.J. Bottomley, Martin K. Petersen,
	linux-scsi, kernel-janitors

On 6/30/2017 1:03 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> If lpfc_nvmet_unsol_fcp_issue_abort() fails then we accidentally
> increment "tgtp->xmt_abort_rsp_error" and then two lines later we
> increment it a second time.
>
> Fixes: 547077a44b3b ("scsi: lpfc: Adding additional stats counters for nvme.")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c
> index 7dc061a14f95..fbeec344c6cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c
> @@ -2583,7 +2583,6 @@ lpfc_nvmet_unsol_fcp_issue_abort(struct lpfc_hba *phba,
>   	}
>   
>   aerr:
> -	atomic_inc(&tgtp->xmt_abort_rsp_error);
>   	ctxp->flag &= ~LPFC_NVMET_ABORT_OP;
>   	atomic_inc(&tgtp->xmt_abort_rsp_error);
>   	lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_ERR, LOG_NVME_ABTS,

looks good.

Signed-off-By: James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: lpfc: spin_lock_irq() is not nestable
  2017-06-30  8:02 [PATCH 1/2] scsi: lpfc: spin_lock_irq() is not nestable Dan Carpenter
  2017-06-30  8:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: lpfc: don't double count abort errors Dan Carpenter
  2017-06-30 14:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] scsi: lpfc: spin_lock_irq() is not nestable James Smart
@ 2017-07-01 21:09 ` Martin K. Petersen
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Martin K. Petersen @ 2017-07-01 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter
  Cc: James Smart, Dick Kennedy, James E.J. Bottomley,
	Martin K. Petersen, linux-scsi, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors


Dan,

> We're calling spin_lock_irq() multiple times, the problem is that on
> the first spin_unlock_irq() then we will re-enable IRQs and we don't
> want that.

Applied to 4.13/scsi-queue.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: lpfc: don't double count abort errors
  2017-06-30  8:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: lpfc: don't double count abort errors Dan Carpenter
  2017-06-30 14:56   ` James Smart
@ 2017-07-01 21:09   ` Martin K. Petersen
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Martin K. Petersen @ 2017-07-01 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter
  Cc: James Smart, Dick Kennedy, James E.J. Bottomley,
	Martin K. Petersen, linux-scsi, kernel-janitors


Dan,

> If lpfc_nvmet_unsol_fcp_issue_abort() fails then we accidentally
> increment "tgtp->xmt_abort_rsp_error" and then two lines later we
> increment it a second time.

Applied to 4.13/scsi-queue.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-07-01 21:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-06-30  8:02 [PATCH 1/2] scsi: lpfc: spin_lock_irq() is not nestable Dan Carpenter
2017-06-30  8:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: lpfc: don't double count abort errors Dan Carpenter
2017-06-30 14:56   ` James Smart
2017-07-01 21:09   ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-06-30 14:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] scsi: lpfc: spin_lock_irq() is not nestable James Smart
2017-07-01 21:09 ` Martin K. Petersen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).