From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Rework handling of scsi_device.vpd_pg8[03] Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 21:42:37 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20170829155013.11124-1-bart.vanassche@wdc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:46819 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751318AbdH3Bmm (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Aug 2017 21:42:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170829155013.11124-1-bart.vanassche@wdc.com> (Bart Van Assche's message of "Tue, 29 Aug 2017 08:50:10 -0700") Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Bart Van Assche Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" , "James E . J . Bottomley" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "Paul E . McKenney" Bart, > The conclusion of a recent discussion about the handling of SCSI device VPD > data is that the code should be reworked such that that data is freed through > kfree_rcu() instead of kfree(). The three patches in this series realize this > and also simplify the VPD code. Please consider these patches for kernel > v4.14. Applied to 4.14/scsi-queue. Thanks! -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering