From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: loading scsi_debug with data integrity hits BUG_ON Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:16:18 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1392858619.22195.24.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:18754 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754172AbaBTTQe (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:16:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1392858619.22195.24.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com> (Nicholas A. Bellinger's message of "Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:10:19 -0800") Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" Cc: Akinobu Mita , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "Martin K. Petersen" , Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , Sagi Grimberg , kmo@daterainc.com >>>>> "nab" == Nicholas A Bellinger writes: nab> Given that there is no (easy) way to ascertain what the original nab> value of bio_integrity->bip_iter.bi_size was post nab> bio_integrity_advance(), dropping this BUG_ON() probably makes the nab> most sense. nab> MKP + Jens, care to ACK + pickup..? Please remove total as suggested by Akinobu. Acked-by: Martin K. Petersen -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering