From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: Fix incorrect reporting of host protection capabilities
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:32:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq1y6mttxvp.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091015191818.GN7545@parisc-linux.org> (Matthew Wilcox's message of "Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:18:18 -0600")
>>>>> "Matthew" == Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> writes:
Matthew> And are these performance path? If not, it might be nice to
Matthew> move them out of line and code them like this:
I compared the object files for the two approaches and it looks like
indexing into the array is a clear win compared to the switch statement.
Also, the DIF case must return the chosen protection type and not
true/false.
scsi: Fix incorrect reporting of host protection capabilities
The advent of DIF Type 2 devices exposed some missing break statements
in the protection mask switch constructs. However, rewriting the code
to use an index into a small static array seemed like a more elegant
solution.
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
index 6e728b1..47941fc 100644
--- a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
+++ b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
@@ -797,30 +797,23 @@ static inline unsigned int scsi_host_get_prot(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
static inline unsigned int scsi_host_dif_capable(struct Scsi_Host *shost, unsigned int target_type)
{
- switch (target_type) {
- case 1:
- if (shost->prot_capabilities & SHOST_DIF_TYPE1_PROTECTION)
- return target_type;
- case 2:
- if (shost->prot_capabilities & SHOST_DIF_TYPE2_PROTECTION)
- return target_type;
- case 3:
- if (shost->prot_capabilities & SHOST_DIF_TYPE3_PROTECTION)
- return target_type;
- }
+ static unsigned char cap[] = { 0,
+ SHOST_DIF_TYPE1_PROTECTION,
+ SHOST_DIF_TYPE2_PROTECTION,
+ SHOST_DIF_TYPE3_PROTECTION };
- return 0;
+ return shost->prot_capabilities & cap[target_type] ? target_type : 0;
}
static inline unsigned int scsi_host_dix_capable(struct Scsi_Host *shost, unsigned int target_type)
{
#if defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY)
- switch (target_type) {
- case 0: return shost->prot_capabilities & SHOST_DIX_TYPE0_PROTECTION;
- case 1: return shost->prot_capabilities & SHOST_DIX_TYPE1_PROTECTION;
- case 2: return shost->prot_capabilities & SHOST_DIX_TYPE2_PROTECTION;
- case 3: return shost->prot_capabilities & SHOST_DIX_TYPE3_PROTECTION;
- }
+ static unsigned char cap[] = { SHOST_DIX_TYPE0_PROTECTION,
+ SHOST_DIX_TYPE1_PROTECTION,
+ SHOST_DIX_TYPE2_PROTECTION,
+ SHOST_DIX_TYPE3_PROTECTION };
+
+ return shost->prot_capabilities & cap[target_type];
#endif
return 0;
}
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-30 2:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-15 18:46 [PATCH] scsi: Fix incorrect reporting of host protection capabilities Martin K. Petersen
2009-10-15 19:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-10-30 2:32 ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq1y6mttxvp.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net \
--to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox