public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek <konrad@virtualiron.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	rwheeler@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com, jeff@garzik.org,
	neilb@suse.de, James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com,
	dgilbert@interlog.com, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4 of 8] sd: Physical block size and alignment support
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:02:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq1y6tr9osg.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090423184421.GB9104@mars.virtualiron.com> (Konrad Rzeszutek's message of "Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:44:21 -0400")

>>>>> "Konrad" == Konrad Rzeszutek <konrad@virtualiron.com> writes:

Konrad> The read_capacity_16 sets the sdkp->hw_sector_size to
Konrad> sector_size:

> @@ -1402,6 +1413,7 @@ static int read_capacity_10(struct scsi_
                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
That's the fallback setting for devices that only respond to READ
CAPACITY(10).


Konrad> That function also returns that value, which sd_read_capacity
Konrad> assigns to the sector_size variable. So when the check for
Konrad> sdkp->hw_sector_size inequality is reached, it is skiped as
Konrad> sdkp->hw_sector_size == sector_size. No?

For devices that support READ CAPACITY(16) (and are thus capable of
reporting physical block size) the two values may differ and the message
is printed.


Konrad> Is that doing a read_capacity_16 or _10?

16.


>> The protocols have been referring to logical blocks for ages.

Konrad> Do they refer to physical blocks as well?

Yep.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

      reply	other threads:[~2009-04-23 19:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <patchbomb.1240464567@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
2009-04-23  5:29 ` [PATCH 1 of 8] block: Expose stacked device queues in sysfs Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23  5:29 ` [PATCH 2 of 8] block: Export I/O topology for block devices and partitions Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23 10:51   ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-23 11:49     ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-04-23 11:55       ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-23 13:22         ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-04-23 13:30           ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-04-23 13:17     ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23 18:13     ` Konrad Rzeszutek
2009-04-23 18:26       ` Ric Wheeler
2009-04-23 18:44         ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-04-23 18:34       ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23  5:29 ` [PATCH 3 of 8] MD: Use new topology calls to indicate alignment and I/O sizes Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23  5:29 ` [PATCH 4 of 8] sd: Physical block size and alignment support Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23  5:29 ` [PATCH 5 of 8] sd: Detect non-rotational devices Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23 10:52   ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-23 11:09     ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-23 11:13       ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-23 11:22         ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-23 11:38       ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-04-23 11:58         ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-23 12:03           ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-23 13:16         ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23 13:33           ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-23 14:10             ` James Bottomley
2009-04-23 14:16               ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-04-23 14:39                 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-23 17:25                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-04-23 17:37                     ` James Bottomley
2009-04-23  5:29 ` [PATCH 6 of 8] sd: Block limits VPD support Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23  5:29 ` [PATCH 7 of 8] scsi_debug: Add support for physical block exponent and alignment Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23  5:29 ` [PATCH 8 of 8] libata: Report disk alignment and physical block size Martin K. Petersen
     [not found] ` <29bae7aef942a1709bb6.1240464575@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
2009-04-23 13:46   ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-04-23 14:05     ` Martin K. Petersen
     [not found] ` <fc4cc94aa1e2612b3489.1240464571@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
2009-04-23 16:37   ` [PATCH 4 of 8] sd: Physical block size and alignment support Konrad Rzeszutek
2009-04-23 18:25     ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23 18:44       ` Konrad Rzeszutek
2009-04-23 19:02         ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=yq1y6tr9osg.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net \
    --to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=konrad@virtualiron.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox