From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek <konrad@virtualiron.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
rwheeler@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com, jeff@garzik.org,
neilb@suse.de, James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com,
dgilbert@interlog.com, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4 of 8] sd: Physical block size and alignment support
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:02:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq1y6tr9osg.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090423184421.GB9104@mars.virtualiron.com> (Konrad Rzeszutek's message of "Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:44:21 -0400")
>>>>> "Konrad" == Konrad Rzeszutek <konrad@virtualiron.com> writes:
Konrad> The read_capacity_16 sets the sdkp->hw_sector_size to
Konrad> sector_size:
> @@ -1402,6 +1413,7 @@ static int read_capacity_10(struct scsi_
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
That's the fallback setting for devices that only respond to READ
CAPACITY(10).
Konrad> That function also returns that value, which sd_read_capacity
Konrad> assigns to the sector_size variable. So when the check for
Konrad> sdkp->hw_sector_size inequality is reached, it is skiped as
Konrad> sdkp->hw_sector_size == sector_size. No?
For devices that support READ CAPACITY(16) (and are thus capable of
reporting physical block size) the two values may differ and the message
is printed.
Konrad> Is that doing a read_capacity_16 or _10?
16.
>> The protocols have been referring to logical blocks for ages.
Konrad> Do they refer to physical blocks as well?
Yep.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-23 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <patchbomb.1240464567@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
2009-04-23 5:29 ` [PATCH 1 of 8] block: Expose stacked device queues in sysfs Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23 5:29 ` [PATCH 2 of 8] block: Export I/O topology for block devices and partitions Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23 10:51 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-23 11:49 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-04-23 11:55 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-23 13:22 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-04-23 13:30 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-04-23 13:17 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23 18:13 ` Konrad Rzeszutek
2009-04-23 18:26 ` Ric Wheeler
2009-04-23 18:44 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-04-23 18:34 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23 5:29 ` [PATCH 3 of 8] MD: Use new topology calls to indicate alignment and I/O sizes Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23 5:29 ` [PATCH 4 of 8] sd: Physical block size and alignment support Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23 5:29 ` [PATCH 5 of 8] sd: Detect non-rotational devices Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23 10:52 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-23 11:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-23 11:13 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-23 11:22 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-23 11:38 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-04-23 11:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-23 12:03 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-23 13:16 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23 13:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-23 14:10 ` James Bottomley
2009-04-23 14:16 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-04-23 14:39 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-23 17:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-04-23 17:37 ` James Bottomley
2009-04-23 5:29 ` [PATCH 6 of 8] sd: Block limits VPD support Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23 5:29 ` [PATCH 7 of 8] scsi_debug: Add support for physical block exponent and alignment Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23 5:29 ` [PATCH 8 of 8] libata: Report disk alignment and physical block size Martin K. Petersen
[not found] ` <29bae7aef942a1709bb6.1240464575@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
2009-04-23 13:46 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-04-23 14:05 ` Martin K. Petersen
[not found] ` <fc4cc94aa1e2612b3489.1240464571@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
2009-04-23 16:37 ` [PATCH 4 of 8] sd: Physical block size and alignment support Konrad Rzeszutek
2009-04-23 18:25 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23 18:44 ` Konrad Rzeszutek
2009-04-23 19:02 ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq1y6tr9osg.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net \
--to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad@virtualiron.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox