From: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 2/5] net: split skb_checksum_help
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:31:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1488277871.3248.34.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALx6S36bZ_tZrXxBj9fNActemMDKYJzA5K1vK9jVED9z9+FwBg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 07:11 -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:
> CHECKSUM_PARTIAL is the preferred mechanism on the transmit path this
> defers defers the checksum computation as long as possible.
> Unfortunately, if SCTP is encapsulated in UDP we will probably need to
> run the SCTP CRC on the host which will be done with your changes to
> skb_checksum_help.
right. Tunnel devices have NETIF_F_SCTP_CRC bit cleared and
NETIF_F_HW_CSUM bit set: so, in this case csum_not_inet can help
recovering non-GSO SCTP packets having ip_summed equal to
CHECKSUM_PARTIAL.
> > I'm not sure if setting CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY fits my case, because this would
> > implicitly skip RX validation when using devices like veth or loopback.
> >
> CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY can be used in the transmit path (really the
> forwarding path), however this I think this must imply that the
> checksum in the packet must be correct. Please see my post about
> drivers that are mistakingly using CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY with LRO since
> the checksum in the packet sent into the stack is not correct.
Ok, now I'm more convinced to use CHECKSUM_NONE :-)
thank you for the attention!
regards
--
davide
Â
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-28 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-23 16:52 [RFC PATCH net-next 0/5] net: improve support for SCTP checksums Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/5] skbuff: add stub to help computing crc32c on SCTP packets Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/5] net: split skb_checksum_help Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 20:59 ` Tom Herbert
2017-01-24 16:35 ` David Laight
2017-02-02 15:07 ` Davide Caratti
2017-02-02 16:55 ` David Laight
2017-02-02 18:08 ` Tom Herbert
2017-02-27 13:39 ` Davide Caratti
2017-02-27 15:11 ` Tom Herbert
2017-02-28 10:31 ` Davide Caratti [this message]
2017-02-28 10:32 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 1/4] skbuff: add stub to help computing crc32c on SCTP packets Davide Caratti
2017-02-28 22:46 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-03-01 3:17 ` Tom Herbert
2017-03-01 10:53 ` David Laight
2017-03-06 21:51 ` Davide Caratti
2017-03-07 18:06 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-03-18 13:17 ` Davide Caratti
2017-03-18 22:35 ` Tom Herbert
2017-04-07 14:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 0/7] improve CRC32c in the forwarding path Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 1/7] skbuff: add stub to help computing crc32c on SCTP packets Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 2/7] net: introduce skb_crc32c_csum_help Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 3/7] sk_buff: remove support for csum_bad in sk_buff Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 4/7] net: use skb->csum_algo to identify packets needing crc32c Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 15:43 ` Tom Herbert
2017-04-07 17:29 ` Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 18:11 ` Tom Herbert
2017-04-13 10:36 ` Davide Caratti
2017-04-20 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 0/7] net: improve support for SCTP checksums Davide Caratti
2017-04-27 12:41 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-04-20 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 1/7] skbuff: add stub to help computing crc32c on SCTP packets Davide Caratti
2017-04-20 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 2/7] net: introduce skb_crc32c_csum_help Davide Caratti
2017-04-27 12:29 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-04-20 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 3/7] sk_buff: remove support for csum_bad in sk_buff Davide Caratti
2017-04-29 20:21 ` Tom Herbert
2017-04-20 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 4/7] net: use skb->csum_not_inet to identify packets needing crc32c Davide Caratti
2017-04-29 20:18 ` Tom Herbert
2017-04-20 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 5/7] net: more accurate checksumming in validate_xmit_skb() Davide Caratti
2017-04-20 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 6/7] openvswitch: more accurate checksumming in queue_userspace_packet() Davide Caratti
2017-04-20 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 7/7] sk_buff.h: improve description of CHECKSUM_{COMPLETE,UNNECESSARY} Davide Caratti
2017-04-29 20:20 ` Tom Herbert
2017-04-07 14:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 5/7] net: more accurate checksumming in validate_xmit_skb() Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 6/7] openvswitch: more accurate checksumming in queue_userspace_packet() Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 7/7] sk_buff.h: improve description of CHECKSUM_{COMPLETE,UNNECESSARY} Davide Caratti
2017-02-28 10:32 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 2/4] net: introduce skb_sctp_csum_help Davide Caratti
2017-02-28 10:32 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 3/4] net: more accurate checksumming in validate_xmit_skb Davide Caratti
2017-02-28 19:50 ` Tom Herbert
2017-02-28 10:32 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 4/4] Documentation: update notes on checksum offloading Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 3/5] net: introduce skb_sctp_csum_help Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 4/5] net: more accurate checksumming in validate_xmit_skb Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 5/5] Documentation: add description of skb_sctp_csum_help Davide Caratti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1488277871.3248.34.camel@redhat.com \
--to=dcaratti@redhat.com \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom@herbertland.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).