From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: lucien.xin@gmail.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org,
marcelo.leitner@gmail.com, nhorman@tuxdriver.com,
vyasevich@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sctp: check duplicate node before inserting a new transport
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 23:19:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170219.181949.2029549204792959633.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ba2afff1b2cf9e0026a23dde02d207583efa3d83.1487320524.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com>
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 16:35:24 +0800
> sctp has changed to use rhlist for transport rhashtable since commit
> 7fda702f9315 ("sctp: use new rhlist interface on sctp transport
> rhashtable").
>
> But rhltable_insert_key doesn't check the duplicate node when inserting
> a node, unlike rhashtable_lookup_insert_key. It may cause duplicate
> assoc/transport in rhashtable. like:
>
> client (addr A, B) server (addr X, Y)
> connect to X INIT (1)
> ------------>
> connect to Y INIT (2)
> ------------>
> INIT_ACK (1)
> <------------
> INIT_ACK (2)
> <------------
>
> After sending INIT (2), one transport will be created and hashed into
> rhashtable. But when receiving INIT_ACK (1) and processing the address
> params, another transport will be created and hashed into rhashtable
> with the same addr Y and EP as the last transport. This will confuse
> the assoc/transport's lookup.
>
> This patch is to fix it by returning err if any duplicate node exists
> before inserting it.
>
> Fixes: 7fda702f9315 ("sctp: use new rhlist interface on sctp transport rhashtable")
> Reported-by: Fabio M. Di Nitto <fdinitto@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Applied.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-19 23:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-17 8:35 [PATCH net] sctp: check duplicate node before inserting a new transport Xin Long
2017-02-17 11:19 ` Neil Horman
2017-02-17 14:32 ` Xin Long
2017-02-17 20:19 ` David Miller
2017-02-18 15:47 ` Xin Long
2017-02-19 23:19 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170219.181949.2029549204792959633.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).