From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 642AE14386D; Wed, 21 May 2025 10:38:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747823912; cv=none; b=WfNNP+4NES4XJKw+c7vGKKoWpheiCZksVinK9uXvWXyHSneP4KojjAh2U9u4w9KSVLghNptTSSLua3W06gI1T9v6CJwYVMTaMnK+n36GEWx9UIbSGdtn+E0YzM8lze2d/xhOZ4yRaEErYsqta+bZEjXuhjjezi2jBmufqT3SOPM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747823912; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aP22tRhItrix52YIZPiTVvPDKBs7jZe4Es3e+EjKrVs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=S8Kbia+XNkEsdFycBxVkAtqQGNGuC6bLslz9qxtKWWm2IwhTLG/2k0oY7Y6nrGtwQy2mURgJ88N2JWuKA0NlBt9chttZtUP5Xo1JCQT5b3hFsq9TmxgIYlLBc3h3UjX5lO/HVrqXZCfHqmpWU2ULZGaaFGz3wmmr+CGhLBWoqI8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=R+hXcp8p; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="R+hXcp8p" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BAD53C4CEE4; Wed, 21 May 2025 10:38:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1747823912; bh=aP22tRhItrix52YIZPiTVvPDKBs7jZe4Es3e+EjKrVs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=R+hXcp8pAKKzCs00FWgYrnC8O7yQAa8uVeh8w3VdkVwNpenLYkEnJri4VfxQGgUmX tPbGB9gAE3C8CQrTF2evARCW2FebIqh0P+lgHT/0Fab1flj+/psCo42ZMn8YD0yz0l wb0ZX64Io59BhUdN/RX3a3K1CRwCEgbG2oDjdQR2G5BeMFTQu9ikyRT231aTCKl3ZY VxHFef/Sf2BpBItLSxucJR4RTvN1MfErTfsiY2WVFQpbmfYyQr+CasunfF++egf9ex N/MC8zR+ATZXZPfbD5ynphUE6BnlsFTbwKudgIqlkY2+GhiMglr9mFXuP69RYKtfYp RVDtb53gCEOzg== Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 13:38:27 +0300 From: Leon Romanovsky To: Eric Biggers Cc: Bernard Metzler , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Daniel Borkmann , Marcelo Ricardo Leitner , Sagi Grimberg , Ard Biesheuvel Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 04/10] RDMA/siw: use skb_crc32c() instead of __skb_checksum() Message-ID: <20250521103827.GK7435@unreal> References: <20250511004110.145171-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20250511004110.145171-5-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20250520131841.GH7435@unreal> <20250520151817.GA1249@sol> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250520151817.GA1249@sol> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 08:18:17AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 04:18:41PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 09:04:04AM +0000, Bernard Metzler wrote: > > > > > > > <...> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Eric! > > > Works fine. Correct checksum tested against siw and cxgb4 peers. > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Bernard Metzler > > > > This patch should go through RDMA repository, Please resend it. > > > > Thanks > > It depends on patches 1-2, and patches 6-7 depend on this one. So your proposal > would require that we drag this out over 3 cycles (patches 1-3,5,8-10 in net in > 6.16, patch 4 in RDMA in 6.17, patches 6-7 in net in 6.18). Can we please just > take the whole series through net in 6.16? There aren't any conflicts. No problem, if it helps. Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky