linux-sctp.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] sctp: fix the sendmsg() flag SCTP_EOF to comply to spec
@ 2009-09-10  3:19 Wei Yongjun
  2009-09-10 17:35 ` Vlad Yasevich
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yongjun @ 2009-09-10  3:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-sctp

It should be possible to send a message and set the SCTP_EOF flag
at the same time, but we don't support it yet. This patch fix the
sendmsg() flag SCTP_EOF to comply to spec.

Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 net/sctp/socket.c |   15 ++++++++++-----
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
index 89af37a..d48e18c 100644
--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
@@ -1540,13 +1540,12 @@ SCTP_STATIC int sctp_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct sock *sk,
 		goto out_nounlock;
 	}
 
-	/* If SCTP_EOF is set, no data can be sent. Disallow sending zero
-	 * length messages when SCTP_EOF|SCTP_ABORT is not set.
+	/* Disallow sending zero length messages when SCTP_EOF|SCTP_ABORT
+	 * is not set.
 	 * If SCTP_ABORT is set, the message length could be non zero with
 	 * the msg_iov set to the user abort reason.
 	 */
-	if (((sinfo_flags & SCTP_EOF) && (msg_len > 0)) ||
-	    (!(sinfo_flags & (SCTP_EOF|SCTP_ABORT)) && (msg_len = 0))) {
+	if (!(sinfo_flags & (SCTP_EOF|SCTP_ABORT)) && (msg_len = 0)) {
 		err = -EINVAL;
 		goto out_nounlock;
 	}
@@ -1603,7 +1602,7 @@ SCTP_STATIC int sctp_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct sock *sk,
 			goto out_unlock;
 		}
 
-		if (sinfo_flags & SCTP_EOF) {
+		if ((sinfo_flags & SCTP_EOF) && msg_len = 0) {
 			SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK("Shutting down association: %p\n",
 					  asoc);
 			sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN(asoc, NULL);
@@ -1835,6 +1834,12 @@ SCTP_STATIC int sctp_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct sock *sk,
 	else
 		err = msg_len;
 
+	if (sinfo_flags & SCTP_EOF) {
+		SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK("Shutting down association: %p\n",
+				  asoc);
+		sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN(asoc, NULL);
+	}
+
 	/* If we are already past ASSOCIATE, the lower
 	 * layers are responsible for association cleanup.
 	 */
-- 
1.6.2.2





^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] sctp: fix the sendmsg() flag SCTP_EOF to comply to spec
  2009-09-10  3:19 [PATCH] sctp: fix the sendmsg() flag SCTP_EOF to comply to spec Wei Yongjun
@ 2009-09-10 17:35 ` Vlad Yasevich
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2009-09-10 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-sctp

Wei Yongjun wrote:
> It should be possible to send a message and set the SCTP_EOF flag
> at the same time, but we don't support it yet. This patch fix the
> sendmsg() flag SCTP_EOF to comply to spec.

Hi Wei

Good start, but I don't think this will work with implicit connection.

We are going to attempt to associate, queue the DATA, and then issue a
shutdown, which will call sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_shutdown() thus never
sending.

Also, we might want to forbid this combination on non-blocking sockets
since we would essentially need to run the whole thing in a separate task.

-vlad

> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  net/sctp/socket.c |   15 ++++++++++-----
>  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
> index 89af37a..d48e18c 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
> @@ -1540,13 +1540,12 @@ SCTP_STATIC int sctp_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct sock *sk,
>  		goto out_nounlock;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* If SCTP_EOF is set, no data can be sent. Disallow sending zero
> -	 * length messages when SCTP_EOF|SCTP_ABORT is not set.
> +	/* Disallow sending zero length messages when SCTP_EOF|SCTP_ABORT
> +	 * is not set.
>  	 * If SCTP_ABORT is set, the message length could be non zero with
>  	 * the msg_iov set to the user abort reason.
>  	 */
> -	if (((sinfo_flags & SCTP_EOF) && (msg_len > 0)) ||
> -	    (!(sinfo_flags & (SCTP_EOF|SCTP_ABORT)) && (msg_len = 0))) {
> +	if (!(sinfo_flags & (SCTP_EOF|SCTP_ABORT)) && (msg_len = 0)) {
>  		err = -EINVAL;
>  		goto out_nounlock;
>  	}
> @@ -1603,7 +1602,7 @@ SCTP_STATIC int sctp_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct sock *sk,
>  			goto out_unlock;
>  		}
>  
> -		if (sinfo_flags & SCTP_EOF) {
> +		if ((sinfo_flags & SCTP_EOF) && msg_len = 0) {
>  			SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK("Shutting down association: %p\n",
>  					  asoc);
>  			sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN(asoc, NULL);
> @@ -1835,6 +1834,12 @@ SCTP_STATIC int sctp_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct sock *sk,
>  	else
>  		err = msg_len;
>  
> +	if (sinfo_flags & SCTP_EOF) {
> +		SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK("Shutting down association: %p\n",
> +				  asoc);
> +		sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN(asoc, NULL);
> +	}
> +
>  	/* If we are already past ASSOCIATE, the lower
>  	 * layers are responsible for association cleanup.
>  	 */


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-10 17:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-09-10  3:19 [PATCH] sctp: fix the sendmsg() flag SCTP_EOF to comply to spec Wei Yongjun
2009-09-10 17:35 ` Vlad Yasevich

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).