From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Matija Glavinic Pecotic <matija.glavinic-pecotic.ext@nsn.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 06:57:24 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] Revert "net: sctp: Fix a_rwnd/rwnd management to reflect real state of the receiver'
Message-Id: <534E29D4.60100@nsn.com>
List-Id: <linux-sctp.vger.kernel.org>
References: <1397504717-19566-1-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com> <534C3DC2.9070604@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <534C3DC2.9070604@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ext Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nsn.com>

Hello Vlad,

On 04/14/2014 09:57 PM, ext Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> The base approach is sound.  The idea is to calculate rwnd based
> on receiver buffer available.  The algorithm chosen however, is
> gives a much higher preference to small data and penalizes large
> data transfers.  We need to figure our something else here..

I don't follow you here. Could you please explain what do you see as penalty?

Thanks,

Matija