linux-sctp.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, davem <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	Jakub Audykowicz <jakub.audykowicz@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sctp: update frag_point when stream_interleave is set
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 13:16:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADvbK_eQKdarLLEdb1V49TJMyiuZ6+QcuMHo=KxXWucboYxsbA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181126122903.GI3601@localhost.localdomain>

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 9:29 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
<marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 05:02:11PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> > sctp_assoc_update_frag_point() should be called whenever asoc->pathmtu
> > changes, but we missed one place in sctp_association_init(). It would
> > cause frag_point is zero when sending data.
> >
> > As says in Jakub's reproducer, if sp->pathmtu is set by socketopt, the
> > new asoc->pathmtu inherits it in sctp_association_init(). Later when
> > transports are added and their pmtu >= asoc->pathmtu, it will never
> > call sctp_assoc_update_frag_point() to set frag_point.
> >
> > This patch is to fix it by updating frag_point when stream_interleave
> > is set in sctp_stream_interleave_init(), which is also called in
> > sctp_association_init(). We're doing this also because frag_point
> > is affected by datachunk's type, namely stream_interleave_0/1.
> >
> > Fixes: 2f5e3c9df693 ("sctp: introduce sctp_assoc_update_frag_point")
> > Reported-by: Jakub Audykowicz <jakub.audykowicz@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  net/sctp/stream_interleave.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/sctp/stream_interleave.c b/net/sctp/stream_interleave.c
> > index 0a78cdf..19d596d 100644
> > --- a/net/sctp/stream_interleave.c
> > +++ b/net/sctp/stream_interleave.c
> > @@ -1327,4 +1327,5 @@ void sctp_stream_interleave_init(struct sctp_stream *stream)
> >       asoc = container_of(stream, struct sctp_association, stream);
> >       stream->si = asoc->intl_enable ? &sctp_stream_interleave_1
> >                                      : &sctp_stream_interleave_0;
> > +     sctp_assoc_update_frag_point(asoc);
>
> I get that by adding it here we avoid adding it twice, one in
> sctp_association_init and another in sctp_process_init, but here it is
> out of context.
>
> The decision on data chunk format is not made on this function but
> higher in the stack and we can leverage that for sctp_process_init,
> and for sctp_association_init, we should have it as close as possible
> to where it initialized pathmtu and did not update the frag point.
okay, but both have to be after sctp_stream_init().
though we want sctp_assoc_update_frag_point()
called right after "asoc->pathmtu = sp->pathmtu;".

diff --git a/net/sctp/associola.c b/net/sctp/associola.c
index a827a1f..a614937 100644
--- a/net/sctp/associola.c
+++ b/net/sctp/associola.c
@@ -252,6 +252,8 @@ static struct sctp_association *sctp_association_init(
                             0, gfp))
                goto fail_init;

+       sctp_assoc_update_frag_point(asoc);
+
        /* Assume that peer would support both address types unless we are
         * told otherwise.
         */
diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
index 4a4fd19..600ca0d 100644
--- a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
@@ -2462,6 +2462,8 @@ int sctp_process_init(struct sctp_association
*asoc, struct sctp_chunk *chunk,
                             asoc->c.sinit_max_instreams, gfp))
                goto clean_up;

+       sctp_assoc_update_frag_point(asoc);
+
        if (!asoc->temp && sctp_assoc_set_id(asoc, gfp))
                goto clean_up;

>
> >  }
> > --
> > 2.1.0
> >

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-26 13:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-26  9:02 [PATCH net] sctp: update frag_point when stream_interleave is set Xin Long
2018-11-26 12:29 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2018-11-26 13:16   ` Xin Long [this message]
2018-11-26 13:46     ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CADvbK_eQKdarLLEdb1V49TJMyiuZ6+QcuMHo=KxXWucboYxsbA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jakub.audykowicz@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).