linux-sctp.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sun Paul <paulrbk@gmail.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
	"linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Problem on SCTP
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 09:30:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFXGftLSFgPpxD6Oak8h1Y5y11-zXWLj0v4ziMFkjX8eZ4ZJgA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170111125708.GA1518@hmswarspite.think-freely.org>

HI

Let me clear the understanding. below is the flow.

1. Client sends to Linux Router: 192.168.206.83 -> 192.168.206.56,
2. Linux router sends to SERVER where the source IP is unchanged:
192.168.206.83 -> 192.168.206.66

My question here is why SERVER cannot response this INIT chunk?

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 8:57 PM, Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 04:39:29PM +0800, Sun Paul wrote:
>> yes. whenever the INIT packet send to 192.168.206.65, it will forward
>> to 192.168.206.66. My question is when this packet arrive to
>> 192.168.206.66, why LKSCTP never pass to user level.
>>
>
> Yes....soo, unlike what you said before, there is some address translation to
> take into account here.  You need to be prepared for that:
>
> https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.sigcomm.org/sites/default/files/ccr/papers/2009/January/1496091-1496095.pdf
>
> Neil
>
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 09:30:39AM +0800, Sun Paul wrote:
>> >> Packet received (From client)
>> >> ===========
>> >>
>> >> No.     Time                          Source                SPort
>> >> Destination           Protocol DPort  Length Info
>> >>                                       DSCP
>> >>       1 2017-01-06 08:52:49.662142    192.168.206.83        50001
>> >> 192.168.206.65        SCTP     3868   98     INIT
>> >>                                       CS0
>> >>
>> >> Frame 1: 98 bytes on wire (784 bits), 98 bytes captured (784 bits)
>> >>     Encapsulation type: Ethernet (1)
>> >>     Arrival Time: Jan  6, 2017 16:52:49.662142000 Malay Peninsula Standard Time
>> >>     [Time shift for this packet: 0.000000000 seconds]
>> >>     Epoch Time: 1483692769.662142000 seconds
>> >>     [Time delta from previous captured frame: 0.000000000 seconds]
>> >>     [Time delta from previous displayed frame: 0.000000000 seconds]
>> >>     [Time since reference or first frame: 0.000000000 seconds]
>> >>     Frame Number: 1
>> >>     Frame Length: 98 bytes (784 bits)
>> >>     Capture Length: 98 bytes (784 bits)
>> >>     [Frame is marked: False]
>> >>     [Frame is ignored: False]
>> >>     [Protocols in frame: eth:ethertype:ip:sctp]
>> >> Ethernet II, Src: RealtekU_54:81:87 (52:54:00:54:81:87), Dst:
>> >> Vmware_81:41:6b (00:50:56:81:41:6b)
>> >>     Destination: Vmware_81:41:6b (00:50:56:81:41:6b)
>> >>         Address: Vmware_81:41:6b (00:50:56:81:41:6b)
>> >>         .... ..0. .... .... .... .... = LG bit: Globally unique
>> >> address (factory default)
>> >>         .... ...0 .... .... .... .... = IG bit: Individual address (unicast)
>> >>     Source: RealtekU_54:81:87 (52:54:00:54:81:87)
>> >>         Address: RealtekU_54:81:87 (52:54:00:54:81:87)
>> >>         .... ..1. .... .... .... .... = LG bit: Locally administered
>> >> address (this is NOT the factory default)
>> >>         .... ...0 .... .... .... .... = IG bit: Individual address (unicast)
>> >>     Type: IPv4 (0x0800)
>> >> Internet Protocol Version 4, Src: 192.168.206.83, Dst: 192.168.206.65
>> >>     0100 .... = Version: 4
>> >>     .... 0101 = Header Length: 20 bytes (5)
>> >>     Differentiated Services Field: 0x02 (DSCP: CS0, ECN: ECT(0))
>> >>         0000 00.. = Differentiated Services Codepoint: Default (0)
>> >>         .... ..10 = Explicit Congestion Notification: ECN-Capable
>> >> Transport codepoint '10' (2)
>> >>     Total Length: 84
>> >>     Identification: 0x0000 (0)
>> >>     Flags: 0x02 (Don't Fragment)
>> >>         0... .... = Reserved bit: Not set
>> >>         .1.. .... = Don't fragment: Set
>> >>         ..0. .... = More fragments: Not set
>> >>     Fragment offset: 0
>> >>     Time to live: 64
>> >>     Protocol: SCTP (132)
>> >>     Header checksum: 0x1c3e [validation disabled]
>> >>         [Good: False]
>> >>         [Bad: False]
>> >>     Source: 192.168.206.83
>> >>     Destination: 192.168.206.65
>> >>     [Source GeoIP: Unknown]
>> >>     [Destination GeoIP: Unknown]
>> >> Stream Control Transmission Protocol, Src Port: 50001 (50001), Dst
>> >> Port: 3868 (3868)
>> >>     Source port: 50001
>> >>     Destination port: 3868
>> >>     Verification tag: 0x00000000
>> >>     [Assocation index: 0]
>> >>     Checksum: 0xbaea49e5 (not verified)
>> >>     INIT chunk (Outbound streams: 3000, inbound streams: 3000)
>> >>         Chunk type: INIT (1)
>> >>             0... .... = Bit: Stop processing of the packet
>> >>             .0.. .... = Bit: Do not report
>> >>         Chunk flags: 0x00
>> >>         Chunk length: 52
>> >>         Initiate tag: 0xe79f40cb
>> >>         Advertised receiver window credit (a_rwnd): 62464
>> >>         Number of outbound streams: 3000
>> >>         Number of inbound streams: 3000
>> >>         Initial TSN: 176990880
>> >>         IPv4 address parameter (Address: 192.168.206.83)
>> >>             Parameter type: IPv4 address (0x0005)
>> >>                 0... .... .... .... = Bit: Stop processing of chunk
>> >>                 .0.. .... .... .... = Bit: Do not report
>> >>             Parameter length: 8
>> >>             IP Version 4 address: 192.168.206.83
>> >>         IPv4 address parameter (Address: 192.168.1.83)
>> >>             Parameter type: IPv4 address (0x0005)
>> >>                 0... .... .... .... = Bit: Stop processing of chunk
>> >>                 .0.. .... .... .... = Bit: Do not report
>> >>             Parameter length: 8
>> >>             IP Version 4 address: 192.168.1.83
>> >>         Supported address types parameter (Supported types: IPv6, IPv4)
>> >>             Parameter type: Supported address types (0x000c)
>> >>                 0... .... .... .... = Bit: Stop processing of chunk
>> >>                 .0.. .... .... .... = Bit: Do not report
>> >>             Parameter length: 8
>> >>             Supported address type: IPv6 address (6)
>> >>             Supported address type: IPv4 address (5)
>> >>         ECN parameter
>> >>             Parameter type: ECN (0x8000)
>> >>                 1... .... .... .... = Bit: Skip parameter and continue
>> >> processing of the chunk
>> >>                 .0.. .... .... .... = Bit: Do not report
>> >>             Parameter length: 4
>> >>         Forward TSN supported parameter
>> >>             Parameter type: Forward TSN supported (0xc000)
>> >>                 1... .... .... .... = Bit: Skip parameter and continue
>> >> processing of the chunk
>> >>                 .1.. .... .... .... = Bit: Do report
>> >>             Parameter length: 4
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 3:18 AM, Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:31:01AM +0800, Sun Paul wrote:
>> >> >> what kind of information do you need? the whole INIT packet?
>> >> >>
>> >> > That would be ideal.
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
>> >> >> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 06:00:36PM +0800, Sun Paul wrote:
>> >> >> >> Hi
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> the linux router just change the destination, so it can arrive on the
>> >> >> >> the SERVER.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> > Please post the relevant snippets from the client and server tcpdump
>> >> >> > operations
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Neil
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 5:51 PM, David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> > From: Sun Paul
>> >> >> >> >> Sent: 09 January 2017 02:08
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> I am setting up a lab where the SCTP traffics from  client is passing
>> >> >> >> >> >> through a linux router before reaching to the SCTP server running
>> >> >> >> >> >> LKSCTP.
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> The linux router did not change the source address of the client, so
>> >> >> >> >> >> when it arrived to the SCTP server, the source address is the oriingal
>> >> >> >> >> >> one.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> the INIT chunk arrive on the SERVER, but then no response. the
>> >> >> >> >> application that using in SERVER is the same as the other test.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> I noticed one thing in Ethernet frame of the incoming packet on the
>> >> >> >> >> SERVER compared to the one captured from the client is the LG bit on
>> >> >> >> >> the source address.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> The LG bit is set to 0 on the request packet received in the
>> >> >> >> >> SERVER,but it is 0 from the one originated on the client. willl it be
>> >> >> >> >> the root cause?
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Which addresses are you talking about, and what do you mean by the LG bit?
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Is your linux 'router' just routing (ie IP forwarding) or is it doing NAT?
>> >> >> >> > If it is changing the IP addresses then the addresses inside some SCTP
>> >> >> >> > chunks also need changing.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >         David
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
>> >> >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> >> >> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> >> >>
>> >> --
>> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
>> >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> >> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> >>
>> >
>> > It looks like you have some destination NAT-ing going on in these packets.  In
>> > one trace your destination address is 192.168.206.65, and in the other its
>> > 192.168.206.66.
>> >
>> > Neil
>> >
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-12  9:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-06  9:34 Problem on SCTP Sun Paul
2017-01-06 11:43 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-01-09  2:06   ` Sun Paul
2017-01-06 12:37 ` Neil Horman
2017-01-09  2:08   ` Sun Paul
2017-01-09  2:30     ` Sun Paul
2017-01-09  9:51     ` David Laight
2017-01-09 10:00       ` Sun Paul
2017-01-09 12:25         ` Neil Horman
2017-01-09 16:31           ` Sun Paul
2017-01-09 19:18             ` Neil Horman
2017-01-10  1:30               ` Sun Paul
2017-01-10  1:31                 ` Sun Paul
2017-01-10 14:33                 ` Neil Horman
2017-01-11  8:39                   ` Sun Paul
2017-01-11 12:57                     ` Neil Horman
2017-01-12  9:30                       ` Sun Paul [this message]
2017-01-12  9:51                         ` David Laight
2017-01-12 10:53                           ` Michael Tuexen
2017-01-13  3:27                             ` Sun Paul
2017-01-13  3:27                               ` Sun Paul
2017-01-13  3:29                               ` Sun Paul
2017-01-13  9:43                                 ` Michael Tuexen
2017-01-13 13:19                                   ` Michael Tuexen
2017-02-21  4:26                                     ` Sun Paul
2017-02-21 15:53                                       ` Xin Long
2017-02-22  1:12                                         ` Sun Paul
2017-02-22  2:00                                           ` Xin Long
2017-02-22  2:29                                             ` Sun Paul
2017-02-22  3:03                                               ` Xin Long
2017-02-23  5:30                                                 ` Sun Paul
2017-02-23  6:07                                                   ` Xin Long
2017-02-27  9:01                                                     ` Sun Paul
2017-02-27 15:06                                                       ` Xin Long
2017-03-01  4:15                                                         ` Sun Paul
2017-03-01  6:43                                                           ` Xin Long
2017-01-16 18:47                                   ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-02-21 18:51 ` Davide Caratti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFXGftLSFgPpxD6Oak8h1Y5y11-zXWLj0v4ziMFkjX8eZ4ZJgA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=paulrbk@gmail.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).