From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
To: network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>,
daniel@iogearbox.net
Subject: [PATCHv3 net 3/3] sctp: change to check peer prsctp_capable when using prsctp polices
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 18:37:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a47d73f795713d26e2a8f41cce639b2ff71466d6.1475087147.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0c3d4e6034f7f77fd341cf5baf116bc91a43bdf8.1475087147.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Now before using prsctp polices, sctp uses asoc->prsctp_enable to
check if prsctp is enabled. However asoc->prsctp_enable is set only
means local host support prsctp, sctp should not abandon packet if
peer host doesn't enable prsctp.
So this patch is to use asoc->peer.prsctp_capable to check if prsctp
is enabled on both side, instead of asoc->prsctp_enable, as asoc's
peer.prsctp_capable is set only when local and peer both enable prsctp.
Fixes: a6c2f792873a ("sctp: implement prsctp TTL policy")
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
---
net/sctp/chunk.c | 4 ++--
net/sctp/outqueue.c | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/chunk.c b/net/sctp/chunk.c
index 14990e2..0a3dbec 100644
--- a/net/sctp/chunk.c
+++ b/net/sctp/chunk.c
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ struct sctp_datamsg *sctp_datamsg_from_user(struct sctp_association *asoc,
msg, msg->expires_at, jiffies);
}
- if (asoc->prsctp_enable &&
+ if (asoc->peer.prsctp_capable &&
SCTP_PR_TTL_ENABLED(sinfo->sinfo_flags))
msg->expires_at jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(sinfo->sinfo_timetolive);
@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ errout:
/* Check whether this message has expired. */
int sctp_chunk_abandoned(struct sctp_chunk *chunk)
{
- if (!chunk->asoc->prsctp_enable ||
+ if (!chunk->asoc->peer.prsctp_capable ||
!SCTP_PR_POLICY(chunk->sinfo.sinfo_flags)) {
struct sctp_datamsg *msg = chunk->msg;
diff --git a/net/sctp/outqueue.c b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
index e084f35..107233d 100644
--- a/net/sctp/outqueue.c
+++ b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ int sctp_outq_tail(struct sctp_outq *q, struct sctp_chunk *chunk, gfp_t gfp)
sctp_chunk_hold(chunk);
sctp_outq_tail_data(q, chunk);
- if (chunk->asoc->prsctp_enable &&
+ if (chunk->asoc->peer.prsctp_capable &&
SCTP_PR_PRIO_ENABLED(chunk->sinfo.sinfo_flags))
chunk->asoc->sent_cnt_removable++;
if (chunk->chunk_hdr->flags & SCTP_DATA_UNORDERED)
@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ void sctp_prsctp_prune(struct sctp_association *asoc,
{
struct sctp_transport *transport;
- if (!asoc->prsctp_enable || !asoc->sent_cnt_removable)
+ if (!asoc->peer.prsctp_capable || !asoc->sent_cnt_removable)
return;
msg_len = sctp_prsctp_prune_sent(asoc, sinfo,
@@ -1055,7 +1055,7 @@ static int sctp_outq_flush(struct sctp_outq *q, int rtx_timeout, gfp_t gfp)
/* Mark as failed send. */
sctp_chunk_fail(chunk, SCTP_ERROR_INV_STRM);
- if (asoc->prsctp_enable &&
+ if (asoc->peer.prsctp_capable &&
SCTP_PR_PRIO_ENABLED(chunk->sinfo.sinfo_flags))
asoc->sent_cnt_removable--;
sctp_chunk_free(chunk);
@@ -1347,7 +1347,7 @@ int sctp_outq_sack(struct sctp_outq *q, struct sctp_chunk *chunk)
tsn = ntohl(tchunk->subh.data_hdr->tsn);
if (TSN_lte(tsn, ctsn)) {
list_del_init(&tchunk->transmitted_list);
- if (asoc->prsctp_enable &&
+ if (asoc->peer.prsctp_capable &&
SCTP_PR_PRIO_ENABLED(chunk->sinfo.sinfo_flags))
asoc->sent_cnt_removable--;
sctp_chunk_free(tchunk);
--
2.1.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-28 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-28 18:37 [PATCHv3 net 0/3] sctp: a bunch of fixes for prsctp polices Xin Long
2016-09-28 18:37 ` [PATCHv3 net 1/3] sctp: move sent_count to the memory hole in sctp_chunk Xin Long
2016-09-28 18:37 ` [PATCHv3 net 2/3] sctp: remove prsctp_param from sctp_chunk Xin Long
2016-09-28 18:37 ` Xin Long [this message]
2016-09-30 6:08 ` [PATCHv3 net 0/3] sctp: a bunch of fixes for prsctp polices David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a47d73f795713d26e2a8f41cce639b2ff71466d6.1475087147.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--to=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).