From: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC net-next v3 0/7] improve CRC32c in the forwarding path
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 14:16:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1491562390.git.dcaratti@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALx6S34cSH+z+humkp5s7UHAqnafHHB-GTqobHyb-SfKNe+MiA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2017-03-07 at 10:06 -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> You might even take this one step
> further. You could convert crc32_csum into a 1 bit enum for now.
> Basically you would use 0 for 1's compliement csum, and 1 to represent
> a crc32c csum. Then if we end up having to add another bit for
> something like FCoE in the future it would give us 4 possible checksum
> types instead of just giving us 1 with a bit mask.
On Sat, 2017-03-18 at 15:35 -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
> Just create a non_ip_csum bit in skbuff.
> csum_bad can replaced with this I think. If the bit is set then more
> work can be done to differentiate between alternative checksums.
hello Alexander and Tom,
I refreshed the series including your suggestions.
Some followups are still possible:
* drivers that parse the packet header to correctly resolve CHECKSUM_PARTIAL
(e.g. ixgbe_tx_csum()) can benefit from skb->csum_algo savng some CPU cycles
(e.g. avoiding calling ip_hdr(skb)->protocol or ixgbe_ipv6_csum_is_sctp(skb)).
* drivers that call skb_checksum_help() to resolve CHECKSUM_PARTIAL can
call skb_crc32c_csum_help (or skb_csum_hwoffload_help(skb, 0)) to avoid
wrong CRC on SCTP packets.
thank you in advance for looking at this!
regards,
--
davide
v3:
* review documentation
* include a fix for corrupted SCTP packets in openvswitch datapath
* skb->crc32c_csum renamed in skb->csum_algo and converted to enum
* deprecate skb->csum_bad to free one bit in struct sk_buff
* use 'CRC32c csum' terminology everywhere
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-07 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-23 16:52 [RFC PATCH net-next 0/5] net: improve support for SCTP checksums Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/5] skbuff: add stub to help computing crc32c on SCTP packets Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/5] net: split skb_checksum_help Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 20:59 ` Tom Herbert
2017-01-24 16:35 ` David Laight
2017-02-02 15:07 ` Davide Caratti
2017-02-02 16:55 ` David Laight
2017-02-02 18:08 ` Tom Herbert
2017-02-27 13:39 ` Davide Caratti
2017-02-27 15:11 ` Tom Herbert
2017-02-28 10:31 ` Davide Caratti
2017-02-28 10:32 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 1/4] skbuff: add stub to help computing crc32c on SCTP packets Davide Caratti
2017-02-28 22:46 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-03-01 3:17 ` Tom Herbert
2017-03-01 10:53 ` David Laight
2017-03-06 21:51 ` Davide Caratti
2017-03-07 18:06 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-03-18 13:17 ` Davide Caratti
2017-03-18 22:35 ` Tom Herbert
2017-04-07 14:16 ` Davide Caratti [this message]
2017-04-07 14:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 1/7] " Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 2/7] net: introduce skb_crc32c_csum_help Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 3/7] sk_buff: remove support for csum_bad in sk_buff Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 4/7] net: use skb->csum_algo to identify packets needing crc32c Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 15:43 ` Tom Herbert
2017-04-07 17:29 ` Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 18:11 ` Tom Herbert
2017-04-13 10:36 ` Davide Caratti
2017-04-20 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 0/7] net: improve support for SCTP checksums Davide Caratti
2017-04-27 12:41 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-04-20 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 1/7] skbuff: add stub to help computing crc32c on SCTP packets Davide Caratti
2017-04-20 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 2/7] net: introduce skb_crc32c_csum_help Davide Caratti
2017-04-27 12:29 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-04-20 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 3/7] sk_buff: remove support for csum_bad in sk_buff Davide Caratti
2017-04-29 20:21 ` Tom Herbert
2017-04-20 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 4/7] net: use skb->csum_not_inet to identify packets needing crc32c Davide Caratti
2017-04-29 20:18 ` Tom Herbert
2017-04-20 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 5/7] net: more accurate checksumming in validate_xmit_skb() Davide Caratti
2017-04-20 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 6/7] openvswitch: more accurate checksumming in queue_userspace_packet() Davide Caratti
2017-04-20 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 7/7] sk_buff.h: improve description of CHECKSUM_{COMPLETE,UNNECESSARY} Davide Caratti
2017-04-29 20:20 ` Tom Herbert
2017-04-07 14:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 5/7] net: more accurate checksumming in validate_xmit_skb() Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 6/7] openvswitch: more accurate checksumming in queue_userspace_packet() Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 7/7] sk_buff.h: improve description of CHECKSUM_{COMPLETE,UNNECESSARY} Davide Caratti
2017-02-28 10:32 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 2/4] net: introduce skb_sctp_csum_help Davide Caratti
2017-02-28 10:32 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 3/4] net: more accurate checksumming in validate_xmit_skb Davide Caratti
2017-02-28 19:50 ` Tom Herbert
2017-02-28 10:32 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 4/4] Documentation: update notes on checksum offloading Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 3/5] net: introduce skb_sctp_csum_help Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 4/5] net: more accurate checksumming in validate_xmit_skb Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 5/5] Documentation: add description of skb_sctp_csum_help Davide Caratti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1491562390.git.dcaratti@redhat.com \
--to=dcaratti@redhat.com \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom@herbertland.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).