From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx.swemel.ru (mx.swemel.ru [95.143.211.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C84D63C465 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2025 01:51:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.143.211.150 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750038669; cv=none; b=Tn3IyJxFHo1VxtrrGWNnCXVr+oQ7BOskQrg2AFrsjg6Zj2XxMvLByc9n/4WSwfWiDE7AvoLdRlxU3Y/y+QB764ktSzv8gt4u36UPc28pDWzo/chAz+/0Rq0qXNihj7Djo9/c0v0mNG5flcsDomVXOMYPI4679Pk7ok1+5zRntFA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750038669; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9s1PJV1j3hlNi+4TSr6xKKounQypyxYL78uJT2oUGQU=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:From:To:Cc:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=oAN35KUwcliLdUsoJc2spaoKFeml4gQnys0T6ylqwVuc3hWHE/2r14MSqeMUHC/tyjkio2n40xNrnbEnD7VZTpc+VvUG89/rmZWYKaDU1F1H9aqtY18UqPMAlKFTKgxfanhim3NaVa304ELBB73H+Z2wXbLfgTY3K9o2LjrMZZE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=swemel.ru; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=swemel.ru; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swemel.ru header.i=@swemel.ru header.b=vLr2BVSE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.143.211.150 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=swemel.ru Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=swemel.ru Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swemel.ru header.i=@swemel.ru header.b="vLr2BVSE" Message-ID: <0c8e9341-d044-42ca-9332-2b284a0e3e5f@swemel.ru> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=swemel.ru; s=mail; t=1750038663; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Pe1y8o2p3mtFL4Ag24BAPY5Og8zefvVpFuS5n9Ae03E=; b=vLr2BVSEB2/HxX3wCVowLSrzV+aKxcDqyYBbOmpNdmRXYcjDCZSt9QOCTUzm9eHznC3vct zVZ3mwc+XXeuUYKuZmA+m8liTm9o3tPLUSb0lzv7bhEyJW1rsfr6Ynu7cNJ5d3gvXQOjQe z3ey+ga/LLob8xk2PO5PA0/fOYo9TxU= Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 04:52:01 +0300 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] smack: fix two bugs in setting task label From: Konstantin Andreev To: Casey Schaufler Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org References: <20250315015723.1357541-1-andreev@swemel.ru> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <20250315015723.1357541-1-andreev@swemel.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jun 2025 01:51:03.0687 (UTC) FILETIME=[1E2AB170:01DBDE61] Konstantin Andreev, 15/03/2025 в 04:57 по Москве: > These two patches have distinct subjects, > but work on the same object, > security/smack/smack_lsm.c`do_setattr() > and the second patch partially overwrites first, > so I combine them in a series. > ... Hi, Casey. If you have time and you could have a look, that would be great. --