From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
casey.schaufler@intel.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
selinux@vger.kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org,
john.johansen@canonical.com, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp,
paul@paul-moore.com, casey@schaufler-ca.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/25] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 08:11:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0e9b813b-a658-ea35-b2ee-90f013fe2500@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1911060238410.30342@namei.org>
On 11/6/2019 2:40 AM, James Morris wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2019, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>
>>> Can you re-base on something more recent than v5.1-rc2 (that's the base for that branch currently)?
>>> At present it won't even boot for me on modern Fedora. Two key missing commits are:
>> Sigh. It's based on James' next-general. As it's going up through James,
>> and he hasn't updated that branch, I'm sort of stuck. BTW, I have a re-based
>> version, but don't see how to get it into my git tree without mucking up
>> the eventual merge.
> Don't use next-general for this. Use the most recent released kernel if
> that works.
On 9/24/2019 10:56 AM, James Morris wrote:
> I'd probably create a new branch (next-stacking) from v5.4 for this work.
I'm planning to switch over once next-stacking gets created. I've stuck
with next-general because my understanding has been to not rebase unless
necessary, and to not get ahead of what where you're expected to land.
I'll rebase now, but fear I may end up with git tree issues moving from
security#next-general.
I am counting on getting next-stacking shortly after 5.4. Let me know
if that plan changes.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-06 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-24 20:52 [PATCH v10 00/25] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2019-10-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v10 01/25] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2019-10-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v10 02/25] LSM: Create and manage the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2019-10-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v10 03/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2019-10-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v10 04/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2019-10-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v10 05/25] net: Prepare UDS for security module stacking Casey Schaufler
2019-10-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v10 06/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2019-10-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v10 07/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-10-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v10 08/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-10-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v10 09/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-10-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v10 10/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-10-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v10 11/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-10-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v10 12/25] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Casey Schaufler
2019-10-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v10 13/25] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2019-10-28 15:25 ` Stephen Smalley
2019-10-29 14:44 ` Simon McVittie
2019-10-29 15:44 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-10-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v10 14/25] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2019-10-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v10 15/25] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-10-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v10 16/25] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_dentry_init_security Casey Schaufler
2019-10-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v10 17/25] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2019-10-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v10 18/25] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2019-10-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v10 19/25] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2019-10-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v10 20/25] LSM: Verify LSM display sanity in binder Casey Schaufler
2019-10-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v10 21/25] Audit: Add subj_LSM fields when necessary Casey Schaufler
2019-10-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v10 22/25] Audit: Include object data for all security modules Casey Schaufler
2019-10-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v10 23/25] NET: Add SO_PEERCONTEXT for multiple LSMs Casey Schaufler
2019-10-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v10 24/25] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context Casey Schaufler
2019-10-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v10 25/25] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2019-10-29 14:53 ` [PATCH v10 00/25] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Stephen Smalley
2019-10-29 15:51 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-11-06 10:40 ` James Morris
2019-11-06 16:11 ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
[not found] <20191113000022.5300-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2019-11-12 23:59 ` Casey Schaufler
[not found] <20191113000913.5414-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2019-11-13 0:08 ` Casey Schaufler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0e9b813b-a658-ea35-b2ee-90f013fe2500@schaufler-ca.com \
--to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox